I'm the lone wolf here at work and they had hoped I would go on my own to get the vaccine as they would "hate to lose me".
It's now come to the follow up of" have you given any consideration to being vaccinated". To which I replied yes I have, and I'm unwilling based on
A} it's simply not needed B} it's a danger to my personal being C} it's ineffective against the current strain{threw that in there because they believe in all of that stuff, I don't} D}. It will never end. Each strain you'll ask me to get the shot, then the booster, then the shot for the new strain. E} I already had the virus and can take the antibody test to prove it.
Now I'm being asked to meet with the head guys secretary which I'm sure will be for show. I've never met him, and he's a lawyer. But I need a few things from you guys
Vaers data showing the adverse effects Natural immunity vs vaccine The EUA document stating Cormidity is not available currently and the only vaccines available now are under EUA only, er go thru can't force me to take it.
I'm currently at work and I don't have a lot of time to find the stuff so I appreciate any help
I'm in the Federal Government and they are accepting medical / religious exceptions. Would it be prudent to mention any of the above or should I just stick strictly to religious grounds?
Just depends on your personal preference. If you want the simple way and they are doing the religious exemption easily, that might be the way to go.
But you can also play hardball. It is very likely you will have to play hardball, sooner or later, even if they "grant" the "exemption."
In reality, the burden of proof is on THEM, and they are committing multiple CRIMES in their effort.
Up to you how to play it.