Yesterday was one of the worst I've had for a while: saw this late and thought it was legit. Checked as far as I could and went to bed. Makes me really wonder what Bannon is about - he must have known this would mislead. Looking at the vid it was a neat set-up, talking over the guy the way he did.
Sorry for the annoyance and the raised hopes this caused.
So how is this false?
US DOMINION, INC. v. GIULIANI (1:21-cv-00213)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/41955367/us-dominion-inc-v-giuliani/
That's a different case. In DC. Sort by descending, nothing new since Sep 17.
Thank you for pointing that out. You are right: I posted this in good faith and have now deleted it.
Respect to you fren
Yesterday was one of the worst I've had for a while: saw this late and thought it was legit. Checked as far as I could and went to bed. Makes me really wonder what Bannon is about - he must have known this would mislead. Looking at the vid it was a neat set-up, talking over the guy the way he did.
Sorry for the annoyance and the raised hopes this caused.