"Ivermectin is RESTRICTED to FDA-approved indications only."
Can someone explain this to me? Hospitals saying ivermectin is not safe and will not be used for treatment.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
A physician has the capacity to prescribe medications NOT intended for a specific treatment. So you can completely ignore what you heard.
The formulary is what the pharmacy stocks and releases. Don't know why a bureaucratic rule can override a doc's prescription!!
The pharmacist has the duty to prevent the fulfillment of any medication they deem unsafe for the patient. For example, a physician may prescribe a medication that contains an ingredient that is associated with another medication the patient is allergic to, the pharmacist has a duty to first pause the prescription, and call the physician for clarification and provide that information.
Now I am not sure what to do about politically motivated outcomes.
You’re talking about contraindicated medications. If you are not taking any other medications that are contraindicated by a prescription a doctor writes for you, the pharmacist has no legal authority to deny that prescription. Your medical history/indications are between you and your doctor.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/pharmacist-conscience-clauses-laws-and-information.aspx
A link to a website describing “Pharmacist Conscience Clauses: Laws and Information” dealing primarily with contraception? Thanks but no thanks. Pharmacist aren’t filling prescriptions for Ivermectin or HCQ because they have been told not to fill these prescriptions for covid diagnosis; not because they conscientiously object to the medication. So doctors have to lie about the diagnosis and say it’s for scabies or malaria. Then the pharmacist will fill the prescription.
Not sure if you just like to argue or what but This was a rebuttal to "the pharmacist has no legal authority to deny that prescription." and that simply is not true.
"Ask your Doctor about the 'benefits' of using Remditchurear. Yes, Remditchurear will remedy your covid problems quickly (and permanently)!"
If your doctor or hospital won't answer your questions about their use of Remdesivir, back away from them... slowly. Try not to let them realize you're escaping. Their non-answer is all the answer you need. Other threads have revealed: Hospitals are being paid almost $50,000 per victim (uhh, per case) to 'treat' people with poisons through ventilators. Oh, it's VERY effective (deadly). Trust the numbers. :(
No, I'm sorry. I don't have any sauce for this right off hand. But Ivermectin is one of the CURES for covid (and a bunch of other maladies) and it's normally CHEAP and the use of Ivermectin circumvents the profit-chain of the whole medical/criminal cabal. https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMwpyF7w/resources-to-fight-vaxx--mask-ma/
So, the medical establishment is NOT gonna make Ivermectin available to you without a HUGE court-case. https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMwpyVZj/law-firms-to-represent-us--vaxx-/
FDA & CDC & medical establishment are corrupted and in cahoots with the black-hats. It's all about ripping off the tax-payers and victimizing the vulnerable.
At present, there still are some OTC remedies - maybe at your health food store - that are almost as effective (maybe even AS effective) as Ivermectin. Look for NAC (follow the label directions). Look for Quercetin and vitamin D-3 (again, follow the label directions). Look for vitamin C and THIS IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. Seek out a 'naturopathic' medical practitioner. Question them carefully - consider their responses judiciously. Trust your gut.
OP, as a wonderful and mysterious white-hat is known to have said (more than once), "you have more than you know". Over the years, too many of us have trusted the wrong people, too much. Medicine ain't what it used to be. To paraphrase Yogi Berra: "the doctors got so popular, nobody goes to see 'em anymore".
THANK YOU for being here! GBY & your loved ones! Working/ researching/ learning/ sharing/ struggling/ standing/ arm-in-arm, together, WE MAGA!
What about Right to Try??
I believe that is for terminally ill patients. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/204
There was a post abt a person dying after the hosp refused to give them ivermectin, so that is pretty terminal. : (
That wouldn't be a pharmacist denying, that would be the physician or hospital.
For Veronica Wolski case: She was denied in Amita Health Resurrection Medical Center which is located in Chicago IL.
The right to try law is regulated by the state on what exactly that means.
According to Illinois State law: https://illinois.lawi.us/99th-regular-session-hb-207/ it applies to drugs not approved for general use and manufactures may give that medication/drug but are not required to.
So unfortunately it looks like at least in that state the law allows people to be denied.
People trying it prophylactically would not be terminally ill.
And this is all for our "own good", right?
I'm not stating an opinion. I am simply stating facts. I personally disagree with the state's law and believe people should be able to choose whatever they want in regards to their health as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others and they are sincerely pursuing a benefit to their health.
Formulary restriction: it means the hospital is telling the doctor what they can and can't prescribe for all their hospital patients. Kind of like how each fast food place is either Pepsi or Coke, the hospital admins limit what each doctor franchise has access to.
Except it's more complicated and legalistic, and they pretend it's because it helps someone besides their pocketbook.
What happened to right to try?