I am doing my best to follow and summarize and here is what I have so far from Maricopa County audit:
The technical/cyber stuff:
Individuals unnamed caught with screenshots overriting about 40,000 files. No accountability because admin accounts shared a password
Anonymous logins and usernames
85673 election related files deleted between 10/28 and 11/05
1064746 election files deleted between 11/01/2020 and 03/16/2021
County withheld routers, poll worker laptops, other ip addresses connected to election network, icx devices and will not give info needed to tell if vote machines were internet connected during vote.
EAC certification should not be valid because:
OS not patched
Anti-virus not updated
Shared accounts and passwords
Didn't establish host or network baseline
Did not preserve security logs in violation of federal law.
The Votes: 17000 duplicate ballots, some 3 duplicates each and a few 4 duplicates
9041 mail in voters returning more ballots than they were sent
3432 more ballots cast then list of people shown who casted vote
1551 votes total in 277 different precincts show more ballots cast than people that voted
397 ballots received that were never sent
254,326 votes do not have corresponding entry in database (protected voters allegedly but no way to verify so far without county cooperation)
23344 mail in ballots that show they moved and no one with last name lives at address
2382 who voted in person despite having moved out of state
2081 moved out of state 29 days before election and should not have gotten ballot.
5047 individuals who voted in more than one county (some may just be same name and birth year)
393 votes incomplete names.
198 registered after cutoff date but still voted
2861 who shared a number with another voter which suggests possible data integrity issue.
282 deceased voters
186 people with duplicate voter IDs that both voted
Am I the only one wondering why Jovan Hutton Pulitzer's kinematic artifacts findings (ballot paper foldings, etc) were not included in the report? I thought that was going to be one of the big reveals. In his review of the audit process, the CyberNinja's CEO (forget his name now, sorry - but awesome guy) showed high resolution cameras (DSLR's) and said photos were taken of each ballot - front and back. I assume that was for Jovan's analysis. So what could have changed for the audit results to not include that information? Thoughts?
Tommorrow Jovan is doing a podcast ... timing? https://jovanhuttonpulitzer.locals.com/upost/1103955/my-kinematicartifact-findings-broken-down-point-by-point
And what about the βwater-markedβ ballots that were alluded to....?
I got the sense that much was held back. Including all of Jovan's stuff. The audit ISN'T done. And by the way, when everything was delayed because the Cyber Ninjas had the Rona...yeah, I don't know about that either. This is a war where responses are fluid, and we've seen it sped up and slowed down before.
He doesn't really need it though - he's the QR inventor - 20 still active patents, I believe.
For many people, there is no such thing as "enough money".