3
Ed_E 3 points ago +3 / -0

My main point of contention is the fact that all the fuel of an airliner is in the wings. We actually see "that" fuel igniting upon impact. But there is a much larger fuel load on the far side of the building. That structural engineering study that many thousands of engineers signed off on, stated without doubt that an aluminum aircraft would never penetrate into a steel and concrete building. And even if it did there is absolutely no fuel in the front half of the plane. So why that huge fireball in that location?

1
Ed_E 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only fuel in that aircraft was in the wings. That fuel can be seen exploding on the nearer side. An aluminum plane cannot "penetrate" steel and concrete, according to the engineers that analyzed the evidence, and design of the buildings. And even if it could, there is no fuel up in the nose. I think we see two separate fuel loads here. The one that is deeper in the building has significantly more of a fireball than the wing-fueled fireball. That doesn't make any sense. The location of the plane's fuel is the key here, IMHO.

4
Ed_E 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is in reference to the video that was supposedly uploaded as "private" years ago, and just now made "public". https://greatawakening.win/p/141s6zZ3g2/new--unseen-911-footage-of-the-s/c/ This is the frame just before the second plane impacted... that's the two blurs on the side facing the camera. On the right side, the explosion is beginning, even though the plane has not yet impacted.

2
Ed_E 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you slow the video down, you can see that there is an explosion beginning on the opposite side of the building before the plane makes its impact. https://greatawakening.win/p/142Amr4Uvz/

2
Ed_E 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice... completely forgot about Geocities!

2
Ed_E 2 points ago +2 / -0

Other than his support for Bernie Sanders, there are not many things I disagree with him on.

3
Ed_E 3 points ago +3 / -0

We are winning! They can't walk the streets!

3
Ed_E 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't get past a "405 Not Allowed" So you are much further ahead than many of us!

5
Ed_E 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes... the "truthful" yet condescending title he gives Potatohead is one way Crowder gets to stay on youtube... that and a good lawyer! Don't worry about being "slow" cuz we all know who wins the race!

4
Ed_E 4 points ago +4 / -0

I appreciate the critical-thinking skills here. MonkeyWerx also did some planefagging and pretty much disproved the timing and tail number data points. Thank You for commenting.

1
Ed_E 1 point ago +1 / -0

And if you feel like you should be hospitalized, Front line protocols call for 3 times, with 5 times being acceptable for severe cases. https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/FLCCC-Alliance-MATHplus-Protocol-ENGLISH.pdf (see note 2 on Ivermectin guidelines)

5
Ed_E 5 points ago +5 / -0

Heavenly Father, we ask that you comfort this family as they face the uncertainty of their struggle. Be with the doctors and nurses and guide them to use treatments that help, regardless of hospital protocols. We ask that you bless them all, and show them your Grace. Please hear our prayers, Oh Lord, Amen.

2
Ed_E 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree with you 100%, I was off FB for years, but when school mask mandates started up, all the local folks who were fighting them were still on FB. I had to join back up just to communicate with like-minded people. We did start a mirror Gab Page, but we only got a few people to join it... sad, but we keep waking more by keeping a presence on FB.

view more: Next ›