I think they were trying hard not to show political biases but wanted to show the reasons to decertify the election. For example: Dr. Shiva showed that there were 17K duplicate ballots but didn't say if they were for Biden or Trump. But, he pointed out that the bulk of those duplicates were ran after November 3rd. That paints a pretty clear picture to me.
Another thing that really stands out is that they observed the person who wrote the script to change/delete data that should have been preserved. Again, if Biden really had more votes would they have touched those machines? No. They would have sat back twiddling their thumbs saying they didn't do anything wrong. It's fair to assume they were deleting information that was in favor of Trump and showed their misdeeds.
I hope my assumptions are correct and the goal is to change elections rules in the future and decertify 2020.
I think they were trying hard not to show political biases but wanted to show the reasons to decertify the election. For example: Dr. Shiva showed that there were 17K duplicate ballots but didn't say if they were for Biden or Trump. But, he pointed out that the bulk of those duplicates were ran after November 3rd. That paints a pretty clear picture to me.
Another thing that really stands out is that they observed the person who wrote the script to change/delete data that should have been preserved. Again, if Biden really had more votes would they have touched those machines? No. They would have sat back twiddling their thumbs saying they didn't do anything wrong. It's fair to assume they were deleting information that was in favor of Trump and showed their misdeeds.
I hope my assumptions are correct and the goal is to change elections rules in the future and decertify 2020.
Yes the subtext is clear. As Q researchers this should be obvious.