He posted a lot of hype leading up to this, I had faith, but there was nothing about the paper? Did I miss something?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Redacted from public presentation today.
Unredacted report (full) was forwarded to the AZ A.G.
Implied is, if information could be used as the basis for criminal charges, you don't publish publicly before proper authority adjudicates.
Based on remarks during the hearing by Senate President Karen Lann
Ok, that make sense.
You mean Karen Fann.... right?
Corrected, thanks.
No worries fren :) just wanted to make sure I was following correctly and there wasn't some other person I wasn't aware of =D
Jovan said he submitted a 197 page report. Pretty interesting it is redacted. Here’s a link where he talks about it.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/boom-scale-1-10-say-12-jovan-pulitzer-seriousness-audit-results-197-pages-arizona-audit-report/?
My question is are these people now released to discuss their findings? I thought that was the case once the findings were made public. Maybe not if their input has criminal ramifications?
They also stated that all findings that identified an individual- a voter or a perp- would remain redacted / obscured and only given directly to the Senate and Brnovich. (From Dr. Shiva's presentation)