The Epoch Times DID in fact cover the Arizona audit
(m.theepochtimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Okay, why did they wait until very late the next day to update this with yesterday's news? Someone in the other post says it takes time to report news. I can promise you, a good reporter, print or broadcast or online, always has a deadline. You can write a story in minutes or even off the top of your head (all broadcasters know how to dictate a story.)
Either they had no intention of updating this until they started getting emails or more than one somebody really fell down on the job.
BTW, if you're on an assignment, you don't close up and go home until the story is filed. Period.
Choosing to see the positive side of this, maybe it was because they got called out here on GAW and felt compelled to cover it solely due to that post?
Any who that's my working theory. We're the news now.
Too right. I saw a few compelling summaries right here on GAW just minutes after the event ended.
Correct.
I think you're right. You have the power of GAW to thank for this, I think. Other than that, or angry subscribers, it makes no sense to wait 24 hours + to write an update.
There was no follow up reporting needed (interviews for reaction quotes, for example) if you're merely reporting on what happened yesterday. Even if there was, that doesn't take long unless you have to have one particular person who you can't find for hours. I don't see that here.
It was published on the day of the audit. Not today.
Right. Took them > 24 hours. Every article since the audit report has reader comments about wheres the fuxk is the coverage. All they could come up with was to edit the false “Biden win confirmed” article?