Saying there are 24 17s in a day to invalidate a coincidence is just as valid as invalidating any other coincidence based on numbers. The point is that maybe the tweet was posted on a 17 to add another indicator of Q.
For the record I'm not agreeing or disagreeing I was simply pointing it out for fairness sake
Saying there are 24 17s in a day to invalidate a coincidence is just as valid as invalidating any other coincidence based on numbers.
This is true only if the other coincidence being invalidated based on numbers also has 24 of that same number happening every single day.
There is no need to sell the idea that a number occurring literally dozens of times per day makes it less impactful from a standpoint of being a special number. It just does. If someone doesn't perceive that, then no amount of insistence will change it. That person will be hourfagging round the clock, every hour on the :17. But there's no law against that, so why not have fun :)
All of it is numberfagging / hopium / reading into things. But the more of these coincidences in the same post, the less likely all of it is purely coincidental.
I see your point that :17 doesn't rank too highly but it's still a numberfag.
Saying there are 24 17s in a day to invalidate a coincidence is just as valid as invalidating any other coincidence based on numbers. The point is that maybe the tweet was posted on a 17 to add another indicator of Q.
For the record I'm not agreeing or disagreeing I was simply pointing it out for fairness sake
This is true only if the other coincidence being invalidated based on numbers also has 24 of that same number happening every single day.
There is no need to sell the idea that a number occurring literally dozens of times per day makes it less impactful from a standpoint of being a special number. It just does. If someone doesn't perceive that, then no amount of insistence will change it. That person will be hourfagging round the clock, every hour on the :17. But there's no law against that, so why not have fun :)
All of it is numberfagging / hopium / reading into things. But the more of these coincidences in the same post, the less likely all of it is purely coincidental.
I see your point that :17 doesn't rank too highly but it's still a numberfag.