Looks like the "pure bloods" have triggered the media ...
(is2.4chan.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
Also the problem with our fellow Americans isn't that their blood is "IMPURE"; it's that they've been ENSLAVED BY THE STATE.
They're unwitting slaves, they've been injected with poison, and they're slowly dying. We should feel compassion and an urge to help them, not set up battle lines against them or call them "mudbloods". (Millions of whites have also been vaccinated, so "mudbloods" just doesn't work, period. Why make it a race thing, wonder who that helps most...)
Let's be honest, is there anything more white supremacist sounding than the "purebloods" vs. the "mudbloods"? Jesus, let's not fall for this glowing C_A propaganda bullshit.
It has to be freebloods plus slavebloods on one team, united against the satanic cabal.
Honestly, as someone who is not White, I didn't even connect purebloods with anything other than a blood not contaminated by poison! I think people have been programmed to see everything through a racial lens.
Yes but with people tossing around purebloods vs. mudbloods, no programming or lens is needed. It's right there in your face, so to speak.
My blood isn't "pure," I'm not from a royal or illuminati bloodline. But it's damn sure free. Free of poisons. Free of control. Free of enslavement.
Freebloods unite!