This was attached to the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) (link)
They [the republicans above] didn't vote specifically for the red flag part; it wasn't an option at this point. They voted to advance the NDAA so the military can get funding for another year.
The democrats put in all sorts of crap into the NDAA everysingleyear for decades because they know the Republicants will vote for it (Military spending). It's a nice trick that every one keeps falling for.
So whatever is in the NDAA that the House just recently passed is going to the Senate and will likely be passed. (female draft is another hot button issue in there)
Yes this has been on ongoing thing since at least last night. You'll see posts here and on other .win sites that are slamming popular MAGA Republicans that seemingly voted Anti- 2A.
It's sort of doublespeak. Yes, technically they did vote for red flag laws and female draft and all sorts of other things. But that was because they voted to pass the NDAA bill so the military can get funding. There was no option to vote 'no' on red flag laws at this juncture. The Democrats have control of the House and they have the most votes to get whatever junk they wanted into the NDAA.
They didn't have to vote Yes anyway. It's called integrity and it's not that complicated. If there is anything in the bill that's wrong, you vote No! If your constituency doesn't want it, and you represent them (which is exactly your job), you vote No!
I agree with you. I'd go even further and claim the NDAA is unconstitutional. But unfortunately over the years democrats and replublicants alike have crafted an evil web of lies and have inextricably linked the military to this ndaa bill.
If the ndaa were to ever not pass it would cripple the military and make all military life complicated (for the children and spouses of service members also). Republican leaning military voters might even be hesitant to vote republican in the future.
This was attached to the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) (link)
They [the republicans above] didn't vote specifically for the red flag part; it wasn't an option at this point. They voted to advance the NDAA so the military can get funding for another year.
The democrats put in all sorts of crap into the NDAA every single year for decades because they know the Republicants will vote for it (Military spending). It's a nice trick that every one keeps falling for.
So whatever is in the NDAA that the House just recently passed is going to the Senate and will likely be passed. (female draft is another hot button issue in there)
It's very much misleading
Yes this has been on ongoing thing since at least last night. You'll see posts here and on other .win sites that are slamming popular MAGA Republicans that seemingly voted Anti- 2A.
It's sort of doublespeak. Yes, technically they did vote for red flag laws and female draft and all sorts of other things. But that was because they voted to pass the NDAA bill so the military can get funding. There was no option to vote 'no' on red flag laws at this juncture. The Democrats have control of the House and they have the most votes to get whatever junk they wanted into the NDAA.
They didn't have to vote Yes anyway. It's called integrity and it's not that complicated. If there is anything in the bill that's wrong, you vote No! If your constituency doesn't want it, and you represent them (which is exactly your job), you vote No!
I agree with you. I'd go even further and claim the NDAA is unconstitutional. But unfortunately over the years democrats and replublicants alike have crafted an evil web of lies and have inextricably linked the military to this ndaa bill.
If the ndaa were to ever not pass it would cripple the military and make all military life complicated (for the children and spouses of service members also). Republican leaning military voters might even be hesitant to vote republican in the future.
What's wrong with female draft? I thought men and women were equal?
^^^This anon gets it.