Section 655 would allow for a temporary emergency rule, but part of that is that they'd need to demonstrate the stab provides significant protection from the hazard.
The fact that those of us in the control group are still alive would most likely stand as definitive evidence warranting a permanent injunction.
Agreed. To your first point, they can not provide any evidence that the shot provides any significant protection. It is not by definition a vaccine, and can only (by "their" own data) lessen symptons.
The intent and scope of OSHA's powers do not allow them to determine the rights of the employee's personal health/medical decisions. This is an extremely overreaching effort by the Feds.
Section 655 would allow for a temporary emergency rule, but part of that is that they'd need to demonstrate the stab provides significant protection from the hazard.
The fact that those of us in the control group are still alive would most likely stand as definitive evidence warranting a permanent injunction.
Agreed. To your first point, they can not provide any evidence that the shot provides any significant protection. It is not by definition a vaccine, and can only (by "their" own data) lessen symptons.
The intent and scope of OSHA's powers do not allow them to determine the rights of the employee's personal health/medical decisions. This is an extremely overreaching effort by the Feds.