Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?
(media.communities.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
Everyone here hates marxism and all the degeneracy it spawns. You seem to be bringing a massive pair of vision-restricting glasses to your analysis here however.
It is a question posed to the reader, and almost every person I’ve got an answer from agreed with my own inclination that p53 is an agent of the Light. So the fact you read into this that the suppression of tumors is “bad” and that the analogy drawn to wider society such that human-analog “cancer suppressors” are deserving of being “lined up and shot” is rather absurd to me.
It’s not even a Marxist concept. Marxism and communism would allow the one feeding off of others to live, not destroy it once it stop contributing to society. It’s literally the polar opposite of Marxism.
It's because it's an actual argument that actual marxists use.
I almost envy the naive comfort you must live so far from them. But I'm surrounded by theire sort, and I'm giving you a heads up. Piss on it if you like, but you're agreeing with the marxist ideal that the selfish cell should be lined up and shot by p53 for failing to put the whole before the self.
You keep saying selfish, but every cell is “selfish”, like every gene and every person is - to a degree. The story is discussing cancerous cells. Cells SO selfish, that they not only cheat, but “capture the rules of the game” (which is to say, break the rules of the body, and metastasize into a tumor) such that their cheating can GROW unabated. This is not mere selfishness, this is the root of all evil.
p53, in a just society, would eliminate the oppressor, not the oppressed. Thus I hoped to evoke a more thought provoking discussion, along the lines of, how are these things determined beyond the “simple” scope of the network of cells we call a body?
I'm not arguing any merits, but framing those this was written in. I'm explaining to you naive sheltered folk who are fortunate to live in comaprably lovely places that this is a piece of Marxist dogma written to justify the dehumanization of people they deem not to be living in accordance with the state, to justify the need and righteousness of lining them up against a wall and shooting them.
That's what this is.
You see a biology question, I immediately recognize it as Marxist dogma. I've seen this exaxt argument before. I recognize the rhetorical framing of the inserted questions on morality and the way it sets up extrapolating up onto society at large.
I'm trying to warn you. Please don't try and fight me just to fight me. Please allow yourself to be warned and raise your guard just a little.