I have said for months that drawing a line in the sand and waiting to see who blinks first was not the best strategy. They already had those defenses baked into the cake and were prepared for them. This strategy takes and sidesteps the mandate because it removes refusal off the table and makes acceptance conditional upon informed consent founded upon information that an employer cannot possibly provide. It actually gives an employer a possible legal out if they are smart enough to see it. This may also wake them up as well when they find out that information they assumed was there, doesn't even exist.
I have said for months that drawing a line in the sand and waiting to see who blinks first was not the best strategy. They already had those defenses baked into the cake and were prepared for them. This strategy takes and sidesteps the mandate because it removes refusal off the table and makes acceptance conditional upon informed consent founded upon information that an employer cannot possibly provide. It actually gives an employer a possible legal out if they are smart enough to see it. This may also wake them up as well when they find out that information they assumed was there, doesn't even exist.