Rules drafted in the wake of the Starr investigation of Clinton say that a special counsel “may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General” (or in this case, the acting attorney general)” for good cause.
Wow, I did not know that my potential inability to explain something is a proof against Q!
If Trump wanted to clean out FBI, do you think he would put someone who would be vocally honest and openly against deep state? or someone who can blend into the swamp and pretend to be one of them until the time is right?
When Q says Trust Wray - he is saying Wray is exactly how the Plan needs him to be. Either a white hat double agent, or a black hat fully under the control of the white hats. Regardless of what it is, he is playing the role as planned.
If this were not true, do you think we will be hearing so much disclosure of FBI and their nefarious false flags after Trump "left the office" ? You have to think critically. Why are more things coming out now that it ever did in the last 4 years?
Didn't Barr make Durham a special council, specifically so that doesn't happen?
Doesn't matter, the Attorney General still has the ability to fire a special prosecutor.
https://www.jacksonville.com/reason/2017-06-27/fact-check-can-president-fire-special-prosecutor
Yeah but: "for good cause" is right there. Then, when good cause isn't shown - it would look criminal on Garland's part.
Looks like you are have no faith in Q and are baffled at why things happen the way it happens
So do you "TRUST WRAY" as Q says, or can you explain it? That's a Q anti-proof if you can't explain it.
Wow, I did not know that my potential inability to explain something is a proof against Q!
If Trump wanted to clean out FBI, do you think he would put someone who would be vocally honest and openly against deep state? or someone who can blend into the swamp and pretend to be one of them until the time is right?
When Q says Trust Wray - he is saying Wray is exactly how the Plan needs him to be. Either a white hat double agent, or a black hat fully under the control of the white hats. Regardless of what it is, he is playing the role as planned.
If this were not true, do you think we will be hearing so much disclosure of FBI and their nefarious false flags after Trump "left the office" ? You have to think critically. Why are more things coming out now that it ever did in the last 4 years?
Well that is great, we now know Garland is playing his role for WH based on your info.
Yes.