(Or there is more content doing the rounds than the 10 min video I saw…)

Mostly soft ball normie talking points in the video that will not red pill many, IMHO…

95% efficacy (versus fractional ARR actual efficacy)

Waning antibodies (justification for boosters)

Myocarditis risk (Pfizer “investigating” but not pulling from the market)

Pfizer scientist still recommending to get the shot

There are plenty of other topics they could have shoehorned into discussion but seemed to keep off the table rather than get scientists on record (unless there is better content being kept for a later video)…

Comirnaty bait & switch

Adverse reactions recorded by EUdravigilance, VAERS, Yellow Card, WHO (1/200 death rate), TGA etc (especially for Pfizer)

How much awareness of deaths and damage among execs and scientists internally and attitudes to these

The coercive contracts in place with governments

The professional indemnity from litigation and strategies in place to obfuscate jab damage

How they view Moderna, J&J and Astra Zeneca jabs

Ingredients such as graphene oxide and what the Japanese scientists found

Incidence of batch inconsistencies relative to distribution of reactions

The immunosuppression impact especially on CD4 and CD8 t-helper and t-killer cells

Suppression of prophylactics, the Ivermectin debate, the IverMERCKtin lookalikes etc etc…

Much more can be added here.

I don’t want to say nothingburger but either a huge missed opportunity just passed by or hopefully PV have a ton more in the can because as it stands, this is not red pill material for normies.