You are correct. Weeks of deep diving on this and using my brain to know that objects don't melt into another object have led to my conclusion that there were no planes flying into towers or the Pentagon or a field. I also heard a couple early interviews with witnesses calling into radio stations about explosions. When asled about seeing planes hit, they said what planes. Why do people not think that this was a simple Hollywood production with a loop of film playing worldwide with a printed script to go with the movie? We watch crazy things on movies and TV that we know aren't real, yet people insist the footage of a plane melting inside a building is real. And yes, show me some plane parts.
I remember they "found" all the passports of the "terrorists". They couldn't ID hundreds of people that died. Yet at the greatest point of impact which you would assume would be the greatest damage being that the Jets "disappeared" they were able to found the passports.
That may very well be the first time in history that any, never mind three towers collapsed within their own footprints because of a fire.
A fire caused by jet fuel that burns at a lower temp then is required to melt steel in order for the building to collapse. To claim that building number 7 (the third tower to collapse) came down because fires fueled by office furnishings really pushes reality. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
Why in the world do companies pay so much money to demolition experts to tear down mega structures so that they fall within their own footprint?
We now see all they need to do is start fires and just let the steel and concrete buildings collapse in complete control on their own.
You are correct. Weeks of deep diving on this and using my brain to know that objects don't melt into another object have led to my conclusion that there were no planes flying into towers or the Pentagon or a field. I also heard a couple early interviews with witnesses calling into radio stations about explosions. When asled about seeing planes hit, they said what planes. Why do people not think that this was a simple Hollywood production with a loop of film playing worldwide with a printed script to go with the movie? We watch crazy things on movies and TV that we know aren't real, yet people insist the footage of a plane melting inside a building is real. And yes, show me some plane parts.
Wag the Dog
Rent it. Watch it.
I remember they "found" all the passports of the "terrorists". They couldn't ID hundreds of people that died. Yet at the greatest point of impact which you would assume would be the greatest damage being that the Jets "disappeared" they were able to found the passports.
That may very well be the first time in history that any, never mind three towers collapsed within their own footprints because of a fire. A fire caused by jet fuel that burns at a lower temp then is required to melt steel in order for the building to collapse. To claim that building number 7 (the third tower to collapse) came down because fires fueled by office furnishings really pushes reality. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
Why in the world do companies pay so much money to demolition experts to tear down mega structures so that they fall within their own footprint? We now see all they need to do is start fires and just let the steel and concrete buildings collapse in complete control on their own.