The U.S. Constitution and all 50 State Constitutions only extend protection to Thr People from a tyrannical govt, NOT tyrannical, "PRIVATE" business.
Constitutionally, EVEN a publicly traded company with govt contracts is STILL considered a "PRIVATE" business entity, and is not subject to U.S./State Constitutional laws when it comes to edicts like these COVID mandates these businesses are forcing on us.
If you doubt me, point me to just 1 Amendment where it says The People are protected from a tyrannical boss, OTHER than work hour restrictions, or any of the CURRENTLY LISTED EEO protections that SCOUTS has ruled on since 1789.
Actually, there is a VERY solid argument being made that because of the repercussions from the Federal Government levied on businesses NOT implementing the VAX policy, the PRIVATE business then becomes a De Facto agent of the Federal Government. It's the induction principle. The employer would not under other circumstance demand the action. It's an extortive paradigm.
The U.S. Constitution and all 50 State Constitutions only extend protection to Thr People from a tyrannical govt, NOT tyrannical, "PRIVATE" business.
Constitutionally, EVEN a publicly traded company with govt contracts is STILL considered a "PRIVATE" business entity, and is not subject to U.S./State Constitutional laws when it comes to edicts like these COVID mandates these businesses are forcing on us.
If you doubt me, point me to just 1 Amendment where it says The People are protected from a tyrannical boss, OTHER than work hour restrictions, or any of the CURRENTLY LISTED EEO protections that SCOUTS has ruled on since 1789.
Actually, there is a VERY solid argument being made that because of the repercussions from the Federal Government levied on businesses NOT implementing the VAX policy, the PRIVATE business then becomes a De Facto agent of the Federal Government. It's the induction principle. The employer would not under other circumstance demand the action. It's an extortive paradigm.