Dear all,
For purposes of religious exemption, is it accurate to say that all currently available COVID-19 vaccines are tainted with abortion somewhere in their production process? Or could an employer counter by saying "well if you don't like abortion then just take [some COVID vaccine that doesn't have this problem]?"
Thank you for your help.
The vaccines are developed with the help of fetal cell lines from aborted babies. No matter if they argue whether or not the babies cells are in the vaccine, it is clear abortion is a vital part of the creation of this vaccine, as well as other vaccines so be prepared for that. I absolutley do not support vaccines that benifit off the murder of innocent unborns.
I had one shot and I will never forgive myself. I need to take time away.
Praying that you will be able to forgive yourself and find spiritual healing. God has already forgiven you. Blessings.
It's not exactly something they tend to tell people about. Antivaxers know because they started digging, but most people had no idea that this has been the norm for years now. They've been doing this with childhood vaccines for some time already.
Unborn children were harmed in the creation of this clotshot
Except, no they weren't.
The original progenitor of the cell line was medically aborted after being found to be unviable. It was 1973. This wasn't a case where a baby was murdered for its cellular data.
It was aborted, very early to get these kinds of cells. There's better arguments than this one, because this one is based on fallacy and makes you look very ignorant.
My dad was considered unviable but he was not aborted and he was born to everyones surprise
You're so small minded and ignorant.
This early term fetus was medically aborted because it was unviable. It would not have lived. It wasn't aborted to harvest its cells. It wasn't reared how you'd rear cattle to eat (something people here seem to have no problem with, mind you).
Yet it's brief time as cellular data (what we all are) has been immortalized and saved countless lives over the years. A feat that is an incredible gift. You're so twisted in knots with your moral outrage that you can't even see the context anymore.
I'm against this set of vaccines, but your point is so incredibly moot when compared to the harsh reality. This is not the argument line to go down.
The vaccine was created by taking advantage of an innocent human being that was aborted. The "why or the "when" does not matter. The vaccine companies have made billions off the backs of the aborted babies that were used in the creation of those vaccines. Bottom line, we live in a society that has normalized abortion FOR ANY REASON and AT ANY TIME and now is normalizing using the cells of these aborted fetuses for the benefit of others. The slippery slope started a long time ago. To take part in any vaccine that benefits off the body of an aborted human being is to participate in a practice I believe is morally wrong and disgusting.
I find it odd, that you would jump into a discussion about religious exemption just to call those of us who believe abortion is wrong in GOD's eyes "small minded and ignorant" and accuse us of "moral outrage". You are completely missing the point. You're either a leftist shill (and apparently vegan which is another clue) or you yourself have had an abortion and you have convinced yourself you are a good person so you argue against anyone who makes you feel bad about yourself. You will not find many people here to side with you on this one. Why are you even here,? It seems much of your post history is telling everyone else they are wrong and ignorant. You sure think highly of yourself "magaprincess"......most shill name ever.
This is an emotional argument not based on reality and easy to disprove. The original progenitor of the cell line was medically aborted.
The cell line is used in testing. In the testing process. It's also mutated far, far away from being the original cell origin.
Bioethics around this specific issue hinge on the moral outrage of abortion. If a fetus was unviable in 1973 and was medically aborted, can you lay claim to the moral outrage of the abortion?
Not logically. Medicine is based on the data gathered by those who come before us.