One thing is for Certain.....
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
I will say it again. I think we are missing the bigger picture with milleys phone call. China had Intel that we were going to attack them. Then we gathered Intel that China was preparing an attack in response.
Milley made the call to let his Chinese counter part know we were not going to attack. Remember, this is after China thought we were going to attack them. It wasn't just some random call where Milley is pledging his allegiance to China.
If Milley is compromised by China, why wouldn't he just let an attack happen rather than prevent one?
I think there are a lot of questions we still need answers to in regards to China's Intel. Were we actually planning an attack and they intercepted the plans? If we weren't planning an attack, which I don't think we were, why would China think that we were? Some way, some how, China had legitimate reason to believe we were going to attack. Hey Nance, care to explain the situation?
Maybe I'm crazy(I am), but the fact that the liberal MSM is painting him as a hero should be a huge red flag. There is more to this story.
This narrative doesn't pass the smell test. There is simply no way China believed we were going to attack them and start the biggest world war of all time. Preposterous.
The only people who could talk themselves into such foolishness would have been those who had such seething hatred for Trump's disruptive presence that they can't think straight.
I promise someone in China can think straight. They were not fearing a first strike from the US. Come on.
Trump would never have done such a thing. Despite it being political suicide for him and the GOP forever, he would have needed Congressional approval to start a thermonuclear war. Talk about impeachments.
This theory reeks of Milley and Pelosi trying to rationalize their treasonous attempts to (1) very publicly scare voters into thinking Trump was impetuous and needed to be separated from the nuclear launch codes, and then (2) promising to take China's side if we indeed got in a war with China.
Also, to make any sense of such a theory, Milley would need to explain why he didn't stop at "hey, I would know, and we aren't preparing to attack China." Instead he went the even more treasonous step by promising to tell China our military plans in the event of war with China. There is no conceivable or believable rationale for that.
Interdasting.
"China had Intel that we were going to attack them"
Where did you get this from or are you making an assumption??
It was in the article I read which I believe was quoting Milleys testimony. I can't find the same article but here is another one. Doesn't give the full scope of the call
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/sep/28/general-mark-milley-senate-hearing-trump-us-politics-live?page=with:block-615323138f0805345f1e0ff9#block-615323138f0805345f1e0ff9