Youre the first ive seen on here to point out that 666 is a mistranslation and that 616 is the true number. It is also the numerical value of Nero’s name in Hebrew as all biblical prophecy refers both to the current period when written and a future period
It is a mistranslation...people continue to operate on the information they have. Its the same thing with Moses parting the Red Sea...in all likelihood this is a mistranslation and he likely parted the Sea of Reeds. Archeological information also seems to indicate that being the correct location. But people go on to refer to him parting the Red Sea.
Youre the first ive seen on here to point out that 666 is a mistranslation and that 616 is the true number. It is also the numerical value of Nero’s name in Hebrew as all biblical prophecy refers both to the current period when written and a future period
Then why does EVERY publication on the subject of Nero v. Christianity state that his names numerical value is 666?
It is a mistranslation...people continue to operate on the information they have. Its the same thing with Moses parting the Red Sea...in all likelihood this is a mistranslation and he likely parted the Sea of Reeds. Archeological information also seems to indicate that being the correct location. But people go on to refer to him parting the Red Sea.