So this is why Trump HAD TO LOSE! - The Great Awakening

So this is why Trump HAD TO LOSE! N C S W I C

posted 3 years ago by KHo3P0 3 years ago by KHo3P0 +466 / -3

This could NEVER happen under a Trump presidency:

Afghanistan withdrawal to give the country back to the Afghani people with enough military fire power to protect themselves while getting their country up and running.
Economic/Electronics standstill with chip shortages while Taiwan shuts down chip production as they systematically rid their electronics of Chinese parts/code.
Supply chain crisis and cargo ships stalled at sea and banned from docking because of reasons in order to prevent Chinese crap flooding our market in order to initiate collapse of CCP economy, which is happening now.

All of these "catastrophes" that Americans are screaming about needed to happen during Biden's fake presidency for optics. And it helps to get the norms to the precipice.

If I'm missing other pieces of the puzzle, please add your ideas.

(All these ideas came from the anonymous collective, so I can't take credit.)

138 comments

138 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (138)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– mengderen 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

When Nov 3rd was happening, Trump and company were watching it go down in the SCIF at the Eisenhower Building, I have no doubt in my mind that he would have set in place the 1 year requirement at that time since we have no idea what was seen at the SCIF level intel except for the evidence at Lindell's Cyber Symposium. "By the book, gentlemen, BY THE BOOK!"

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– propertyofUniverse 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks. That's what I was thinking. Things may accelerate in November. Waiting until January would be so hard.