Can you explain the positive side to optics like this? I can't see it, but open to being wrong. Because MTG called out Lin's faith, she kind of hit a nerve with me, and I don't see how these undercurrents of division are beneficial unless MTG is really trying to get people to not trust Lin.
I remember not too many weeks ago, some here were expressing doubts about Lin Wood. The moral here is that nobody's perfect, and both Lin Wood and MTG have done more work to advance the cuase of freedom than any two of most of us or our leaders. It is good to call out what we feel are mistakes and shortcomings, but let's not tear down our own. Suggest that each statement of criticism be accompanied by two complimentary statements.
She doesn't do anything legislative and she doesn't say anything original and most telling, she's doing zip, nada about the steal in her own state. She's giving me strong vibes of a Rubio clone.
Fixing the steal is the job of state politicians. She has expressed support for efforts to audit the election, and has never opposed it. Yes, a good test of her will be if she continues to propose legislation when the Republicans run the House and she can actually pass substantive legislation. We will see.
Only problem with that is that the only thing she does involves her microphone. The biggest single thing we've got to solve is the massive and obvious stolen election. Compared to the loss of the vote, every single one of her cosponsored bills is a waste of energy.
Can you explain the positive side to optics like this? I can't see it, but open to being wrong. Because MTG called out Lin's faith, she kind of hit a nerve with me, and I don't see how these undercurrents of division are beneficial unless MTG is really trying to get people to not trust Lin.
I remember not too many weeks ago, some here were expressing doubts about Lin Wood. The moral here is that nobody's perfect, and both Lin Wood and MTG have done more work to advance the cuase of freedom than any two of most of us or our leaders. It is good to call out what we feel are mistakes and shortcomings, but let's not tear down our own. Suggest that each statement of criticism be accompanied by two complimentary statements.
She doesn't do anything legislative and she doesn't say anything original and most telling, she's doing zip, nada about the steal in her own state. She's giving me strong vibes of a Rubio clone.
Fixing the steal is the job of state politicians. She has expressed support for efforts to audit the election, and has never opposed it. Yes, a good test of her will be if she continues to propose legislation when the Republicans run the House and she can actually pass substantive legislation. We will see.
Only problem with that is that the only thing she does involves her microphone. The biggest single thing we've got to solve is the massive and obvious stolen election. Compared to the loss of the vote, every single one of her cosponsored bills is a waste of energy.
Agreed. Both have said some stupid things at times, but don't we all? I'll keep both in my WH column for now.