It started with understanding the perspective of the medical community. They know how much money and brainpower goes into the science behind their profession, and how powerful a force for truth and understanding that system CAN be when operating in good faith like its supposed to.
So if they believe that powerful tool is working correctly, there is no way joe blow off the street has better information than them, period.
So. If we want to convince them, the first step HAS TO BE introducing doubt into their minds about that system.
I am asking for help from anons to put together some information to show corruption. Some good stuff would be the paperwork from the CDC guidelines that shows different PCR cycles for vaccated vs non vaccinated. That's just one thing they have done but it's a good one to bring up, because there is ZERO excuse for it. There is no possible explanation for changing those cycles other than bad faith explanations.
Before you even mention Covid, you need to make a crack between them and this institution that they are relying on.
If we can put together something easy to read and verify, that cannot be rationalized away as "just an ignorant mistake" or "you just don't understand the science" we can put a crack on the wall in their minds that's keeping them from seeing the truth we all are seeing. Then they might be receptive to other information we share.
Thoughts and criticism welcome.
The only people a doctor will ever listen too is another doctor.
It has to be somebody with a reputation and a position. No Stew Peters rando you've never heard of talking about self-assembling machines, or graphene or brain amoebas, or fucking 5G cell towers.
Nobel Prize winning virologist is a good start
https://thenewamerican.com/french-nobel-prize-winner-warns-vaccines-facilitate-development-of-deadlier-covid-variants-urges-the-public-to-reject-jabs/
https://archive.is/Z4gl0
Dr. Byram Bridle is a viral immunologist and associate professor at the University of Guelph, the 4th ranked University in Canada.
Listen to his summation first, and then listen to the whole video from the beginning for more detailed information.
https://vimeo.com/557428309#t=7m48s
(Start at 7:48 for short summary) https://rumble.com/vicxu9-dr.-byram-bridle-discussing-latest-discoveries-about-covid-vaccines-and-spi.html
https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge
A professor of Medicine at Texas A&M University’s College of Medicine and practicing internist and cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough a recipient of the Simon Dack Award from the American College of Cardiology and the International Vicenza Award in Critical Care Nephrology for his scholarship and research. He has published over 1000 publications and more than 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine.
This is long video but very well done, and the speaker is very highly respected and cannot simply be brushed off as a nutjob. The video covers the entire pandemic and ends with the vaccine.
https://vimeo.com/553518199
Where he discusses the fake paper in Lancet
https://vimeo.com/553518199#t=40m1s
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/06/27/dr-peter-mccullough-whistleblowers-inside-cdc-claim-injections-have-already-killed-50000-americans
Dr. Mike Yeadon is a life science researcher and former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer. He is a co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd and has 30 years experience with developing vaccines.
Short Version
https://rumble.com/vih0k3-dr.-michael-yeadon-final-warning.html
Long version
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Ci2jK1yFoOd/
I'm only 1 but had some success in 'insulting' their intelligence.
For example I have multiple heart diagnoses and blood clots from before the virus thingy. So when he asked me to take the vax I ask him questions: Isnt that the one they say cause cardiomyositis and blood clots? Didnt you review my history? Why would YOU want me to take a shot that could give me more of what youre treating me for?
Another doctor wanted me to take the shingles, pneumonia, flu and rona shots. I just kept asking: What's in it? (they never know). Why do I need barium, strontium, aluminum, mercury..etc... in my body? What does that do to a person? Oh, you dont know but YOU advise me to take it.
I still think doctors are afraid of malpractice suits.
Well done.
Did you have to find another doctor to then remove your boot from his ass?
I'm in the process of moving anyway.
But have not returned to those doctors either.
Good resource:
https://www.primarydoctor.org/covidvaccine
Unfortunately, Medscape seems to be the only source of this, and they have it blocked unless you register.
Pfizer's own study showed MORE suspected cases of Covid in the vaxx group than the placebo group:
Page 42. This is the document Pfizer submitted to FDA. Everything else from Pfizer is marketing, not the truth of their research.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
According to Karen Kingston (though I cannot find the original source), Pfizer went on to PCR test the 287 in the placebo group, and 162 were "positive."
They only got 8 "positive" in the vaxx group, BUT that was because they only tested 9 people! They STOPPED testing the vaxxed group after just 9, and did not test the remaining 400. Kingston says they claimed they "ran out of time."
So, if there is NO EVIDENCE regarding transmission because THEY DID NOT LOOK AT THAT AT ALL, and MORE people in the vaxx group had symptoms than in the placebo group, then ...
WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE MYSTERY JUICE?