So I looked up this article, read it. And it is as clear as mud. It does however say that comirnaty is the approved drug. But for some reason it seems to suggest that the current one, is comirnaty just with no name?? I think?? Not sure. But as far as I understand, the current vaccines are still only under emergency approval only, and that comirnaty isn't going to be available until 2023...
The Comirnaty name is supposed to be the new name to release to market upon approval which it supposedly is, yet no lots have had comirnaty on the vials yet as far as I know.
Be wary of fine details. They do not say that the EUA version and the Cmirnaty version are identical. They say that there are minor differences that do not matter. Now, the EUA version has no package paperwork declaring the composition. There is no legal liability. There is no way they can be held to any standard of faithful product definition, representation, and production. The Comirnaty version is supposedly only different in ways that do not affect safety or effectiveness. How in Hell can that ever be substantiated if you do not have a legally verified composition for the EUA version? Moreover, it is not sufficient to have paperwork alleging the composition. You have to have an assay of the actual substance to see WHAT IT IS, not what it is SUPPOSED TO BE. (In my line of work, we get annual training on the importance and seriousness of "product substitution" violations.)
All these assurances are worthless. And this is not even touching the issue that the EUA version has no legal liability and the Comiraty version is supposed to have legal liability.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
So I looked up this article, read it. And it is as clear as mud. It does however say that comirnaty is the approved drug. But for some reason it seems to suggest that the current one, is comirnaty just with no name?? I think?? Not sure. But as far as I understand, the current vaccines are still only under emergency approval only, and that comirnaty isn't going to be available until 2023...
In any case, this is just some info I found.
The Comirnaty name is supposed to be the new name to release to market upon approval which it supposedly is, yet no lots have had comirnaty on the vials yet as far as I know.
Be wary of fine details. They do not say that the EUA version and the Cmirnaty version are identical. They say that there are minor differences that do not matter. Now, the EUA version has no package paperwork declaring the composition. There is no legal liability. There is no way they can be held to any standard of faithful product definition, representation, and production. The Comirnaty version is supposedly only different in ways that do not affect safety or effectiveness. How in Hell can that ever be substantiated if you do not have a legally verified composition for the EUA version? Moreover, it is not sufficient to have paperwork alleging the composition. You have to have an assay of the actual substance to see WHAT IT IS, not what it is SUPPOSED TO BE. (In my line of work, we get annual training on the importance and seriousness of "product substitution" violations.)
All these assurances are worthless. And this is not even touching the issue that the EUA version has no legal liability and the Comiraty version is supposed to have legal liability.