Sometimes you have to unravel the onion to see what it is.

• Plaintiffs were not calling for an election audit.
• The word audit is thrown around, but that's not what this was.
• Plaintiffs were alleging that their votes were diluted due to election fraud, which they personally witnessed.
• They wanted to enter evidence to support their claim.
• The evidence they needed was in possession of the Defendants.
• The evidence they needed was an inspection of the absentee ballots in Fulton County.
• Fulton County did not want to produce the ballots.
• Plaintiffs and judge tried to figure out an alternative method to verify the evidence.
• Ultimately, an "inspection" by Georgia (officials?) claimed that no counterfeit ballots were found.
• Now, what do you do?
• The Plaintiffs need access to the evidence to show there was fraud, which diluted their vote, but they can't get that evidence.
• A Georgia "official" says that such evidence does not exist.
• If no evidence exists, then there is no evidence, and there is no case.
• Case dismissed.

But the problem is why should we believe the Georgia inspectors? What is THEIR evidence that they are telling the truth, or even that they did a proper inspection?

Besides all that ...

WHERE THE FUCK IS THE GEORGIA LEGISLATURE?

No balls to do what is right by the people who have the legal authority to do a real election audit.