Swampy - this response makes no sense, at least to me. For one thing, as Logical as you usually are: Why did you "Forget civility & judicious statement of the case within the ban reasons" ?
CIAMM has admitted performing the deletion and ban. The fact is that, in all the other things we were checking to ensure our public actions were circumspect, we never got to consider for policy's sake the public nature of the ban notes and to establish an agreement as to limitations on the ban language that would be used. And that's my fault, as it should have been actively addressed rather than passively permitted to continue without policy.
Swampy - this response makes no sense, at least to me. For one thing, as Logical as you usually are: Why did you "Forget civility & judicious statement of the case within the ban reasons" ?
CIAMM has admitted performing the deletion and ban. The fact is that, in all the other things we were checking to ensure our public actions were circumspect, we never got to consider for policy's sake the public nature of the ban notes and to establish an agreement as to limitations on the ban language that would be used. And that's my fault, as it should have been actively addressed rather than passively permitted to continue without policy.