LMAO - Like a dumbass judge has the constitutional right to tell someone what to say. 😂😂😂
Tell that woke liberal “judge” to go F himself.
LMAO - Like a dumbass judge has the constitutional right to tell someone what to say. 😂😂😂
Tell that woke liberal “judge” to go F himself.
Libtards would say that saying something anti-vaccine is equivalent to the 'yelling fire in a crowded theater' exception to the 1st Amendment.
Everything depends on them keeping up the myth that the vaccines are 'safe and effective'. It is the same mirror principle at play. The vaccines are obviously dangerous and completely ineffective.
2020 proved that the flu shot was completely unnecessary. To eradicate the flu all you need is a cloth mask.
Forthelead was being sarcastic. kek
https://fort-russ.com/2020/04/kennedy-pentagon-study-shows-flu-shot-raises-risk-of-coronavirus-by-36-and-theres-more/
yeah and its a crap shot they guess the variant that they think will be most prevalent for that years flu. Thats "science"
I had already decided to refuse to take it back when I thought it is was probably safe and effective. My main concern was about the vaccine passport, and that the more people that refused to get the vaccine would make it harder for them to mandate it. Because it is only a matter of time before they morph the vax-pass into a Chinese Social scoring system.
That does not apply if the theater is actually on fire.
Our theater is definitely on fire.
Out of pure whimsy, does the inverse apply? If the place was on fire and you sneaked out without sounding the alert, would it be criminal?
Only in California, Florida, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Minnesota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin
"Reeee muh stoichastic terrorism!"
Not a myth, it's an out right LIE!
You are absolutely right. The LIE is intentional and that word carries the proper connotation.
There is nothing illegal about yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theater. If there really IS a fire, you have a DUTY to inform others. It is only if you are being dishonest that it could be considered illegal, but then fraud is always illegal.
So, is he telling the truth? If yes, then it cannot be censored by the government.
I'm not defending the judge. I was pointing out what libtards would say.