Not being able to tell the difference between the coronavirus and the 'flu is a bug and not a feature.
PCR tests are inherently unsuitable for clinical diagnosis. They will always give a high false negative at low cycles and a high false positive at high cycles. In effect, the cycle count determines the proportion of positive results. It means the test it useless clinically, but very useful for politics because it allows manipulation of figured.
Can you now see why they want to run PCR test at different cycle counts for vaxxed and unvaxxed?
The PCR tests are also good at detecting the 'flu. They aren't very specific, which is why the FDA is withdrawing them.
They didn’t withdrawal them, they actually expanded them
But believe whatever you want
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/08-02-2021-lab-alert-Clarifications_about_Retirement_CDC_2019_Novel_Coronavirus_1.html
Not being able to tell the difference between the coronavirus and the 'flu is a bug and not a feature.
PCR tests are inherently unsuitable for clinical diagnosis. They will always give a high false negative at low cycles and a high false positive at high cycles. In effect, the cycle count determines the proportion of positive results. It means the test it useless clinically, but very useful for politics because it allows manipulation of figured.
Can you now see why they want to run PCR test at different cycle counts for vaxxed and unvaxxed?
F R A U D !