What you said about the Pfizer vaccine isn't true, and it's downplaying the gravity of the FDA's decision to approve it. An EUA can be granted if there are no "adequate, approved, and available" alternative therapeutics. Right now, the approved Pfizer vaxx and all the EUAs can coexist because the approved vaccine isn't "available" (i.e., not enough of it has been manufactured yet under the dumb new name to innoculate the population), and it isn't "adequate" for all populations (it's only approved for ages 16+, so the EUA covers 12-15 year olds).
To me, the fact that the FDA actually approved the vaxx AND approved it in a way where the EUAs are still technically valid is worse than it outright lying about the approval. At least lying would be a tacit acknowledgment that the regulatory agency knows that what it's doing is wrong.
To be fair there are adequate, available BUT purposely unapproved therapeutics. They are playing games. Im am completely against this fake vaxx and the therapeutic suppression. They must hang for their crimes.
Exactly. The approval is in a way where the EUAs still stand. That said, they could even approve some drugs, like HCQ or Ivermectin, for treating certain aspects of the coof and the EUAs would still be valid, since those therapeutics would arguably be "inadequate" to completely prevent and cure the disease. The law itself is too open-ended. The blame falls on the legislators, in my opinion, for giving such broad discretion to an agency that is extremely vulnerable to regulatory capture. The corruption flows from congress, sorry to say.
What you said about the Pfizer vaccine isn't true, and it's downplaying the gravity of the FDA's decision to approve it. An EUA can be granted if there are no "adequate, approved, and available" alternative therapeutics. Right now, the approved Pfizer vaxx and all the EUAs can coexist because the approved vaccine isn't "available" (i.e., not enough of it has been manufactured yet under the dumb new name to innoculate the population), and it isn't "adequate" for all populations (it's only approved for ages 16+, so the EUA covers 12-15 year olds).
To me, the fact that the FDA actually approved the vaxx AND approved it in a way where the EUAs are still technically valid is worse than it outright lying about the approval. At least lying would be a tacit acknowledgment that the regulatory agency knows that what it's doing is wrong.
To be fair there are adequate, available BUT purposely unapproved therapeutics. They are playing games. Im am completely against this fake vaxx and the therapeutic suppression. They must hang for their crimes.
Exactly. The approval is in a way where the EUAs still stand. That said, they could even approve some drugs, like HCQ or Ivermectin, for treating certain aspects of the coof and the EUAs would still be valid, since those therapeutics would arguably be "inadequate" to completely prevent and cure the disease. The law itself is too open-ended. The blame falls on the legislators, in my opinion, for giving such broad discretion to an agency that is extremely vulnerable to regulatory capture. The corruption flows from congress, sorry to say.