Well, the first line is wrong, as is most of the rest.
The Virology Journal isn't published by the NIH, it's published by a for-profit company that Fauci has nothing to do with. So, the rest of the article goes on to refer to the researchers as "Fauci's Researchers" - they aren't. They have nothing to do with each other.
If you can't get the first sentence right, then why bother even reading the rest?
So, then further down it says Fauci is the director of the NIH, he isn't. He's the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - which is just one of 27 different departments at the NIH. He didn't hold the director role 15 years ago.
I'm not defending Fauci, he's a piece of shit, but let's at least try to be slightly accurate so people don't all us liars.
It’s very true that we can’t fight their attempts to cast peoples health in jeopardy because of their political whims if there are glaring mistakes. Gives me hope for this movement and I’m proud to stand behind it when exaggerating and fake videos are questioned. It’s easy to fall into the same traps they do out of spite, but that doesn’t win any online battles.
Well, the first line is wrong, as is most of the rest.
The Virology Journal isn't published by the NIH, it's published by a for-profit company that Fauci has nothing to do with. So, the rest of the article goes on to refer to the researchers as "Fauci's Researchers" - they aren't. They have nothing to do with each other.
If you can't get the first sentence right, then why bother even reading the rest?
So, then further down it says Fauci is the director of the NIH, he isn't. He's the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - which is just one of 27 different departments at the NIH. He didn't hold the director role 15 years ago.
I'm not defending Fauci, he's a piece of shit, but let's at least try to be slightly accurate so people don't all us liars.
It’s very true that we can’t fight their attempts to cast peoples health in jeopardy because of their political whims if there are glaring mistakes. Gives me hope for this movement and I’m proud to stand behind it when exaggerating and fake videos are questioned. It’s easy to fall into the same traps they do out of spite, but that doesn’t win any online battles.
I'm not going to research your nit-picking. I don't give a shit who wrote it. It's true. I am finished discussing this topic with you.
Sounds about right.
Make wild claims, then when you're bullshit is pointed out you run away.