https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1 <-- THE STUDY ON MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS SHOWING THAT THE VACCINE IS MORE LIKELY TO KILL YOUNG MEN THAN COVID ITSELF! I should clarify that it is still undergoing the peer-review process so this is a "pre-print" of the paper. The information is so important and shocking that it needs to get out there anyway. We can't wait on the peer-review process to be fully completed while continuously rolling the dice with young men's lives. No, the shots must stop NOW.
I took this study to our school board here in California. They still do not listen. I am going to try to contact the author of the paper, as Davis is only 45 minutes from us. Maybe I can get her to come speak. Worth a try!
“ Peer-reviewed” is a dog whistle for Starbucks baristas, journalists, and liberal arts majors. It’s an absolutely worthless phrase and an unnecessary and corrupt process. No one with an IQ above 110 really gives a shit whether it’s peer-reviewed or not.
The real litmus test is “reproducible results”, not “per-reviewed”
If you can't assess whether a study was adequately peer reviewed and confirmed rather than jumping to either "believe all the science" or "it's all bullshit", you have no right to have any opinion.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1 <-- THE STUDY ON MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS SHOWING THAT THE VACCINE IS MORE LIKELY TO KILL YOUNG MEN THAN COVID ITSELF! I should clarify that it is still undergoing the peer-review process so this is a "pre-print" of the paper. The information is so important and shocking that it needs to get out there anyway. We can't wait on the peer-review process to be fully completed while continuously rolling the dice with young men's lives. No, the shots must stop NOW.
I took this study to our school board here in California. They still do not listen. I am going to try to contact the author of the paper, as Davis is only 45 minutes from us. Maybe I can get her to come speak. Worth a try!
Good luck to you. Get CA back to red with a common sense again.
“ Peer-reviewed” is a dog whistle for Starbucks baristas, journalists, and liberal arts majors. It’s an absolutely worthless phrase and an unnecessary and corrupt process. No one with an IQ above 110 really gives a shit whether it’s peer-reviewed or not.
The real litmus test is “reproducible results”, not “per-reviewed”
If you can't assess whether a study was adequately peer reviewed and confirmed rather than jumping to either "believe all the science" or "it's all bullshit", you have no right to have any opinion.
Yes, it is a pre-print, which means anyone can post there to be reviewed. But, this paper is not currently being reviewed by anyone.
it’s not yet peer-reviewed, fyi