ok well Hitler wasn't a jew. thats literally the most stupid thing I've ever heard.
Listen, I get it. I'm not providing evidence to support that. You should be skeptical, of course. I also said "maybe". I haven't done enough research into that myself. But to suggest "its the most stupid thing you've ever heard"...
Wow
You need to do some more research into reality. There are things that are provably almost certainly true that are WAY more outrageous than that.
Though the idea may seem preposterous to some, the question seems to stem from the remote possibility that Hitler's grandfather was Jewish. Hitler's father, Alois, was registered as an illegitimate child with no father when born in 1837 and to this day Hitler's paternal grandfather is unknown. Alois’ mother, Maria Schicklgruber, is known to have worked in the home of a wealthy Jew, so there is some chance, however small, that a son in that household got Hitler's grandmother pregnant.
In 2010, the British paper The Daily Telegraph reported that a study had been conducted in which saliva samples were collected from 39 of Hitler's known relatives to test their DNA origins and found, though inconclusively, that Hitler may have Jewish origins. The paper reported: A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in [the Hitler] samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews ... Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 per cent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 per cent to 30 per cent of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population. This study, though scientific by nature, is inconclusive.
Of course they finish off with:
Despite the claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish.
They provide no evidence to support that claim. It seems to be made in protest of the evidence.
can you tell me, with 100% certainty, that he was not a lizard person alien? in fact, NO studies have done to determine whether he had lizard DNA or whether he would shed his skin while toasting under a heat lamp. I've heard rumors that he laid eggs, but could not confirm these. In fact, the very fact that there has been NO discussion by the mainstream media into his lizard ancestry means they MUST be hiding something!
and follow with
Do you realize how fucking stupid you sound?
Back at ya. This is called a straw man argument. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about nor the evidence (such as it was) that I presented, but you want to pretend that they are the same thing.
you looked into hitlers jewish origins
What?
I showed evidence that he was Jewish. Where do you get that I found he wasn't Jewish? You REALLY need to read what I am writing, not pretending I am saying things I am not.
the cognitive dissonance you have is astounding.
Believe it or not, I am trying to help you out of this exact trap.
analogy: a comparison of two things based on their being alike in some way
Your statements of "the media not talking about Hitler being an alien" and my statements of "here is evidence that supports Hitler being a Jew" are not "alike" in any way, therefore it was not an analogy.
Your evidence/source that he was jewish literally ended with "DESPITE THESE CLAIMS, ADOLF HITLER WAS NOT JEWISH".
...
Did you not read what I wrote?
They gave nothing but evidence that said Hitler was a jew.
Then they ended with "Despite these claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish."
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
Do you not see?
Can't you see?
One more time.
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
...
Why do you think that the MAIN JEWISH SOURCE ended with "Hitler was not a Jew" after providing NOTHING but evidence that supported him being a Jew?
Think...
What is the difference between evidence and statements?
Listen, I get it. I'm not providing evidence to support that. You should be skeptical, of course. I also said "maybe". I haven't done enough research into that myself. But to suggest "its the most stupid thing you've ever heard"...
Wow
You need to do some more research into reality. There are things that are provably almost certainly true that are WAY more outrageous than that.
This is from the a the official Jewish library.
Of course they finish off with:
They provide no evidence to support that claim. It seems to be made in protest of the evidence.
You said:
and follow with
Back at ya. This is called a straw man argument. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about nor the evidence (such as it was) that I presented, but you want to pretend that they are the same thing.
What?
I showed evidence that he was Jewish. Where do you get that I found he wasn't Jewish? You REALLY need to read what I am writing, not pretending I am saying things I am not.
Believe it or not, I am trying to help you out of this exact trap.
Your statements of "the media not talking about Hitler being an alien" and my statements of "here is evidence that supports Hitler being a Jew" are not "alike" in any way, therefore it was not an analogy.
...
Did you not read what I wrote?
They gave nothing but evidence that said Hitler was a jew.
Then they ended with "Despite these claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish."
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
Do you not see?
Can't you see?
One more time.
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
...
Why do you think that the MAIN JEWISH SOURCE ended with "Hitler was not a Jew" after providing NOTHING but evidence that supported him being a Jew?
Think...
What is the difference between evidence and statements?