Consider this:
The EO is designed to deconstruct the United States by economic class. They are going after the working class first. It is the democidal soft-kill of the working class in America. The intention is to hobble and destabilize the entire economy. Once the working class is destroyed, and this means many businesses will perish as well, only the large international corporations will survive. It just so happens these corporations do not share our interests. Have you noticed many of the worker unions have either been silent on this issue and against their own union members? Coincidence?
Once this criteria succeeds, then the tyranny will turn to the welfare class. They will be mandated to take the vaxx or lose their welfare benefits. The police State will be used to brutally enforce ‘order’, including removing children from parents homes and jabbing them against their parents wishes. The police state will be used to prevent rioters from destroying businesses using expanded powers and the use of curfews to keep order. The George Floyd riots using the BLM and the mercenary Antifa backers provides the excuse to to impose such policies.
If welfare recipients were told to either get the COVID-19 vaxx or lose their benefits now, there would be riots in the streets the very same day.
Mandating one class of people to be vaxxed and not including another class to be mandated is discrimination and egregiously violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This is modern Jim Crow. The sooner blacks recognize this, the better chance it is for saving themselves from what is to come.
This EO directly challenges the Civil Rights Act.
The reason the EO didn't include the Welfare recipients is because government fear of riots. Does this mean welfare recipients won't be mandated? No. They are next in line.
If black America and other ethnic groups are not aware of this, they should be informed now that they're next.
I think before the jab tyranny is unleashed on the Welfare class, they will make examples of those that receive Social Security and Medicare benefits, both of which we older workers have been paying for all of our working careers.
Think about this. What age group is probably highest % jabbed? I would think the answer is those above 65. So that would mean, that the anti-jabs would be a smaller percentage of this group, than of any other age range. Who will stand up for us? Will all the rest of those opposed to jab rally for the small percentage of us in this age groups who are opposed? Will everyone else take the "They came for the Jews, but I was not a jew, so I did nothing" type position? Or will everyone else take the "An attack on one of us, is an attack on all" approach.
As a side note: I thought when I got medicare eligible, that I would get that for free, because I've been paying for it all my life. Heck I have to pay the government more than $400 a quarter for medicare.
I was always leery of Medicare and figured not to go there. Also, you probably correct in those SS people being made an example of. It's a precedent for setting a narrative.