Imagine my surprise...
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
I don't like this argument. If they did require it, that wouldn't make it serious to me.
But they don't, proving it's not serious. With all the other bullshit you'd think it'd be easy to just require it for them anyway regardless of seriousness but they didn't even do that. Almost like they forgot, or something. Or maybe they do it on purpose since they don't want their official IRS letter deliverers dying of the vax or all going on strike and refusing to deliver anything. Who knows.
Further, we know they're corrupt, so if they required it that's just more corruption. However, the fact that they don't require it and the fact there isn't a mass dying-off of mail carriers proves it isn't serious.
They couldn’t because they needed to justify mail in voting.
No offense but the ‘anons’ have no idea about what’s happening at the Postal Service.
Similar situation for homeless people. There'd be no homeless left if an actual pandemic had happened, because the tent-villages would have been decimated by it before a "vaccine" could even be formed.
This is a much stronger argument than the original.
It's the same argument.
Actually they do, I know someone that works for USPS. I’m not sure about Fedex, UPS, DHL, but I think they all fall under that ‘large company’ (<100 employees) “mandate”.
If they did tomorrow, which they could, would it be serious then? No.
Again, that has exactly nothing to do with what them not doing it means. One can be true without the other (not doing it = not serious, doing it =/= serious).
Which makes this a bad argument. Guess I'm glad you agree now.