So apparently they took a shot of a bullet coming out of a gun which uses a special bullet with out enough powder to make the bullet leave the barrel but the prop guys didn’t clean the gun so in the next scene he uses a blank with lots of powder to make a big flash but no bullet but since they never cleaned the gun he turned shot at the camera and it went through the photography women and hit the director standing behind her… in short, they used the JFK assassination magic bullet. Smells like shit just like Rumsfeld and Powell both dying from multiple myeloma and now they’re peddling Condi Rice out in the public
With my limited understanding of movie sets, there are both prop guns and real guns. They have fake dummy guns (made out of rubber or something) for when they need to just hold it and don’t have to actually shoot. Prop guns (real but non-functional) for when they do close ups or have to manipulate them in some way but not shoot. Modified (so no blank adapter is visible) real functional guns when they shoot. They’re supposed to shoot blanks (crimped casing with less powder and no actual bullet). They have dummy rounds (bullet and casing w/no powder/primer) for when you need to see the rounds. All of this is supposed to be treated as dangerous and highly controlled/cleared/checked by the master armorer for the set. They’re not supposed to shoot without one on set. Other than a freak Brandon Lee type accident (blank cartridge put in behind dummy bullet), where the armorer wasn’t on set , this isn’t supposed to be able to happen.
i agree with that, as well as the whole Laundrie saga, she was known to have something to do with sandy hook protesting or something, that alone made my eyebrows go up, if sh died thats very tragic, however that same scenario happens daily throughout the country and this story consumed the top 5 headlines of MSM every day for the last few months, along with that we have filler BS like baldwin, now fbi says laundries remains were found but only bines and the area was under water and water receded and bones were discovered that REALY smells like BS
My guess is that the actual case itself, whatever the big news is about whenever big news are needed to direct attention away from something else, can easily be real in itself. Lots is going on and happening all the time. The misdirection is, in most cases, probably more of MSM working to balloon something out of proportion, something that otherwise would soon fade out of view, when they want to draw attention away from something else. They search for something with a human interest angle, maybe a pretty young woman who has gone missing, or a celebrity doing something or involved in something if any of them happen to be at the moment, whatever, then start to talk a LOT about it, speculate, invent scandalous theories, whatever to make IT the talk of the town - or the country, whatever is needed. And then they don't write about that other thing at all, or write only very little.
Pretty often MSM sources don't even seem to actually directly lie when they want to skew something they don't like but can't completely ignore. They misdirect, leave things unsaid, implicate other things, draw attention to something, interview that person instead of that other person, select which interview they will show, or show just a part of that other interview, get a photo of the claimed victim looking like a . And when it comes to what seems like big news vs something that doesn't, the same tactics.
And in the end the impression is that something was claimed that wasn't actually claimed, or that something not very big seems like huge news while something that should have been huge news seems like a wet firecracker at best. And if ever confronted in ways they can't ignore they can fairly truthfully claim not having lied, and any misdirection or whatever - oh, we were wrong, and then you get that last page correction printed in small nobody really notices unless you were actually searching for it.
"Why are you shooting in the direction of the directors in the first place? Wouldn't you be shooting in the direction of the other characters in the scene?"
So apparently they took a shot of a bullet coming out of a gun which uses a special bullet with out enough powder to make the bullet leave the barrel but the prop guys didn’t clean the gun so in the next scene he uses a blank with lots of powder to make a big flash but no bullet but since they never cleaned the gun he turned shot at the camera and it went through the photography women and hit the director standing behind her… in short, they used the JFK assassination magic bullet. Smells like shit just like Rumsfeld and Powell both dying from multiple myeloma and now they’re peddling Condi Rice out in the public
With my limited understanding of movie sets, there are both prop guns and real guns. They have fake dummy guns (made out of rubber or something) for when they need to just hold it and don’t have to actually shoot. Prop guns (real but non-functional) for when they do close ups or have to manipulate them in some way but not shoot. Modified (so no blank adapter is visible) real functional guns when they shoot. They’re supposed to shoot blanks (crimped casing with less powder and no actual bullet). They have dummy rounds (bullet and casing w/no powder/primer) for when you need to see the rounds. All of this is supposed to be treated as dangerous and highly controlled/cleared/checked by the master armorer for the set. They’re not supposed to shoot without one on set. Other than a freak Brandon Lee type accident (blank cartridge put in behind dummy bullet), where the armorer wasn’t on set , this isn’t supposed to be able to happen.
Horse shit to take focus off audits and everything else.
i agree with that, as well as the whole Laundrie saga, she was known to have something to do with sandy hook protesting or something, that alone made my eyebrows go up, if sh died thats very tragic, however that same scenario happens daily throughout the country and this story consumed the top 5 headlines of MSM every day for the last few months, along with that we have filler BS like baldwin, now fbi says laundries remains were found but only bines and the area was under water and water receded and bones were discovered that REALY smells like BS
Bones in under 1 month too!
My guess is that the actual case itself, whatever the big news is about whenever big news are needed to direct attention away from something else, can easily be real in itself. Lots is going on and happening all the time. The misdirection is, in most cases, probably more of MSM working to balloon something out of proportion, something that otherwise would soon fade out of view, when they want to draw attention away from something else. They search for something with a human interest angle, maybe a pretty young woman who has gone missing, or a celebrity doing something or involved in something if any of them happen to be at the moment, whatever, then start to talk a LOT about it, speculate, invent scandalous theories, whatever to make IT the talk of the town - or the country, whatever is needed. And then they don't write about that other thing at all, or write only very little.
Pretty often MSM sources don't even seem to actually directly lie when they want to skew something they don't like but can't completely ignore. They misdirect, leave things unsaid, implicate other things, draw attention to something, interview that person instead of that other person, select which interview they will show, or show just a part of that other interview, get a photo of the claimed victim looking like a . And when it comes to what seems like big news vs something that doesn't, the same tactics.
And in the end the impression is that something was claimed that wasn't actually claimed, or that something not very big seems like huge news while something that should have been huge news seems like a wet firecracker at best. And if ever confronted in ways they can't ignore they can fairly truthfully claim not having lied, and any misdirection or whatever - oh, we were wrong, and then you get that last page correction printed in small nobody really notices unless you were actually searching for it.
Laundry guy just decided to do his laundry in the water and fell in? Yeah! That's the ticket!
How does a prop gun shoot someone ??? If its a prop gun for a movie prop do they and are they capable of firing live rounds ???
I would add:
"Why are you shooting in the direction of the directors in the first place? Wouldn't you be shooting in the direction of the other characters in the scene?"
somthing stinks with this
This type of "accident" has happened before...
https://allthatsinteresting.com/brandon-lee-death
yep