The holocaust is also "well sourced". History is written by the victors and it can be difficult to pierce the veil of whatever narrative has been constructed by the victors.
I never said the Holocaust wasn't well sourced. But if you're explaining to someone the Holocaust do you just send them on a text wall or do you send them to a page with sources that backup the claims? That's a rhetorical question, you send them somewhere with sources dumbass.
If the sources are government court docs or video/audio evidence of people involved/ events taking place, then they have clout and will stand on their own. They can question those all they want.
The holocaust is also "well sourced". History is written by the victors and it can be difficult to pierce the veil of whatever narrative has been constructed by the victors.
I never said the Holocaust wasn't well sourced. But if you're explaining to someone the Holocaust do you just send them on a text wall or do you send them to a page with sources that backup the claims? That's a rhetorical question, you send them somewhere with sources dumbass.
I'm trying to say being willing to question sources is important. Because they're sure as hell going to question/dismiss ours.
If the sources are government court docs or video/audio evidence of people involved/ events taking place, then they have clout and will stand on their own. They can question those all they want.
Whaaat? Get out of here! Everything about the holocaust is 100% real. ;)