Lancet study showing the highest efficacy of any C19 vaccine being 1.3%
(www.thelancet.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Any and all stats related to either C19 or the vaccine are bullshit.
This was by the admission of the CDC itself when it recalled the PCR test because it was bullshit.
So, all numbers derived from that bullshit are bullshit. All stats derived from bullshit numbers are bullshit.
There is no actual evidence that this "vaccine" ever had any efficacy re: preventing or lessening C19. Period.
The only evidence existing is "because we said so". Because we said so from the very same people who have lied to us at every step of this event, starting with the bullshit about it being a disease from a bat at a wet market in China.
Every step. No exceptions. Every. Damn. Step. Has been lies and bullshit.
Agree 100%. Would this include the Antibody tests, too?
Is there an actual virus? Or did the depraved degenerates cause some form of spike protein producer to be released for human consumption to make it appear as if a virus.
Remember, the people that claimed it was a virus also claimed it was caused by a species jump from bats to humans in a wet market in Wuhan. The source was a lie. MIght the cause be too?
And remember when early on the hospitals in NYNY were so slammed and hammered by the massive wave of infecteds that a USN hospital ship and some volunteer medical outfits set up overflow medical centers (ship at dock and tents in the park) that never saw much of any patients. But the hospitals were soo overwhelmed. Where were the patients?
And the same hospitals had to have their own employees go out on the street next to the hospital and line up acting like patients trying to get in when it was noticed by folks with cell phone cameras that there was zero traffic, in or out, at these hospitals.
Etc.
So on.
So forth.
And ad nauseum.
Every. Single. Damn. Thing. Out of their mouths or published by them has been outted as a lie. Without exception.
From this we can safely surmise that the entire event is orchestrated and as of now, the only infection spreader is the jab.
Yup. I agree with all of that - including the Infection Injection as the primary source for the Chyna Virus.
My question is more pointed at the nature of the Antibody test. My thinking is, if there is no isolation, and the PCR tests can't identify it, then how can we have a test to identify the "antibody" for it?? Are the Antibody tests simply detecting an antibody for a flu variant, and we're just "calling" it the covid antibody?
Other than being completely brainwashed, why does my wife's Dr hands down affirm she had it "because she took an antibody" test?
I had to just shake my head at him and say we're just going to have to agree to disagree.
Well the CDCs own literature on the antibody tests say that a positive result for antibodies could mean antibodies for any coronavirus including the common cold
I believe there is a virus but it is not the virus doing any damage. The damage is done by the spike proteins they did the GoF research on. The virus was just the initial means to spread the spikes. They are now spreading the spikes through the vax calling it different variants. The whole thing is utter bullshit.
Yes agreed, however sources of *legitimate data (or at least considered legitimate) are useful for people trying to avoid mandates or exclusion from education and similar scenarios, this is the intention here