If this is accurate, a lot of people have taken a dive off the precipice into destruction.
Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.
If you follow the official NHS UK weekly reports, they show that the vaccinated have been gradually getting more and more likely to catch the WuFlu, to the point where every vaccinated age group over 30 is now more likely to catch the WuFlu than the unvaccinated. The under 30s will join them once their initial 4 months of slight protection wears off.
So the immune systems of those who took the clot shot are statistically getting weaker with regard to the WuFlu. I haven't personslly calculated the weekly percentage drop off, but 5% per week sounds about right (bearing in mind that the clot shot initially gave them slight additional protection).
However, I haven't seen any data with regard to their immune system versus other viruses, so as you say, a source of data highlighting their response to all viruses would be interesting.
Seriously. Until then it should be treated as fake news to scare us all and make us repeat the lie to others with the purpose of making you sound crazy.
If someone has a legit source it’s more than welcome. This is a hell of an accusation.
Too soon to tell. However a few things I remember seeing with all of the vax terrorism which may help people make better decisions. 70% of the vaccines go to our genitals. Bill Gates has sterilised a bunch of people with vaccines before. The hydra looking parasite in vaccines eat the "yolks" out of our eggs. I think personally not all vaccines will have the same solution. Some will kill you, some will sterilize you, and perhaps some are placebos
This sounds like a fear pushing article for views. Anyone care to chime in? We need to look closely as medical data can be twisted to suit narratives.
As some commentators have pointed out, the conclusion of this article is very weakly (if at all) supported by the raw data. For one thing, the authors are working solely off infection rates, comparing between vaxed and unvaxed, and infection (based, presumably on a positive covid test) does not demonstrate a failing immune system. For another, the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes.
I have had some respect for this website in the past, but am now questioning its credibility.
Perhaps, in the future, we will know of the immune depleting effects of the vax. But this article does not support that conclusion at all (and the more it is cited, i fear, the more vax-cautious folks will be regarded as kooks-with good reason.)
When I read this a few days ago I thought maybe they were conflating immune system with anti-body levels.
In the latest UK report they did mention n-antibody levels were less in vaccinated individuals after infection compared to unvaccinated. In other words, the vaccine is preventing the immune system from developing a normal immune response, which could be an indicator for acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
The data from the official NHS UK WuFlu reports shows categorically that the vaccinated's protection has been getting weaker and weaker each week, to the point where some vaccinated age groups are now twice as likely to catch the WuFlu as the unvaccinated.
However, that isn't the same as AIDS obviously as AIDS is specifically defined as losing your immune system due to HIV.
However, to the vaccinated who were tricked into destroying their immune systems, it doesn't really matter how they lose their immune system, the end result is the same. The name we refer to it by, doesn't change the fact that they have ruined their immune system, probably irreparably.
That comment doesn't seem to question the data, just the conclusions made from it.
My quick scan of the data in the linked documents indicates a mixed outcome. But I didn't read the reports in their entirety (in the links). I suppose I should have spent more time scanning the reports to verify the trends in the article.
One thing I did notice is that the data changes over time, and it seems to be trending in the wrong direction to support the conclusions of the last report, which suggests the vaccines are preventing infections and covid mortality. The conclusion is correct insofar as the data presented (within the specified time frame), but the trends are important.
If this is accurate, a lot of people have taken a dive off the precipice into destruction.
I have seen that reported here a few times, but it really needs a more solid sauce.
If you follow the official NHS UK weekly reports, they show that the vaccinated have been gradually getting more and more likely to catch the WuFlu, to the point where every vaccinated age group over 30 is now more likely to catch the WuFlu than the unvaccinated. The under 30s will join them once their initial 4 months of slight protection wears off.
So the immune systems of those who took the clot shot are statistically getting weaker with regard to the WuFlu. I haven't personslly calculated the weekly percentage drop off, but 5% per week sounds about right (bearing in mind that the clot shot initially gave them slight additional protection).
However, I haven't seen any data with regard to their immune system versus other viruses, so as you say, a source of data highlighting their response to all viruses would be interesting.
Seriously. Until then it should be treated as fake news to scare us all and make us repeat the lie to others with the purpose of making you sound crazy.
If someone has a legit source it’s more than welcome. This is a hell of an accusation.
I agree with the need for more and better sources of information
if any of you fucked someone whos been vaxxed, you have AIDS now
What if they fucked me?
then ur clean and u have many tendies from dwac in your future
The government did that.
Not sure if that's how it works, but there's a 0% chance I'm fucking anyone with the vax just in case.
Also because I'm married to a pureblood and I'm faithful.
Too soon to tell. However a few things I remember seeing with all of the vax terrorism which may help people make better decisions. 70% of the vaccines go to our genitals. Bill Gates has sterilised a bunch of people with vaccines before. The hydra looking parasite in vaccines eat the "yolks" out of our eggs. I think personally not all vaccines will have the same solution. Some will kill you, some will sterilize you, and perhaps some are placebos
If that were true, they wouldn't be segregating vaxxed and unvaxxed on dating apps. Still, better not to fuck around and find out.
This sounds like a fear pushing article for views. Anyone care to chime in? We need to look closely as medical data can be twisted to suit narratives.
When I read this a few days ago I thought maybe they were conflating immune system with anti-body levels.
In the latest UK report they did mention n-antibody levels were less in vaccinated individuals after infection compared to unvaccinated. In other words, the vaccine is preventing the immune system from developing a normal immune response, which could be an indicator for acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
The data from the official NHS UK WuFlu reports shows categorically that the vaccinated's protection has been getting weaker and weaker each week, to the point where some vaccinated age groups are now twice as likely to catch the WuFlu as the unvaccinated.
However, that isn't the same as AIDS obviously as AIDS is specifically defined as losing your immune system due to HIV.
However, to the vaccinated who were tricked into destroying their immune systems, it doesn't really matter how they lose their immune system, the end result is the same. The name we refer to it by, doesn't change the fact that they have ruined their immune system, probably irreparably.
That comment doesn't seem to question the data, just the conclusions made from it.
My quick scan of the data in the linked documents indicates a mixed outcome. But I didn't read the reports in their entirety (in the links). I suppose I should have spent more time scanning the reports to verify the trends in the article.
One thing I did notice is that the data changes over time, and it seems to be trending in the wrong direction to support the conclusions of the last report, which suggests the vaccines are preventing infections and covid mortality. The conclusion is correct insofar as the data presented (within the specified time frame), but the trends are important.
I think it’s true. It’s on the internet.
Finally...someone who gets it. ; )