Dude you need to pick one, either accept government accepted history or pick non-governmental primary sources. You wanna play both sides because the narrative you choose to believe is not the truth.
I am literally making a historical site on US history from the year 1817 to 2021 And your logical fallacy of thinking someone needs to be a respected historian is laughable. How do you suppose someone learn recently history like NAZI Germany? You say its not what history teaches us, and so I tell you I am getting information from the people there. The primary source. And you have issue with it. You would rather hear it from someone who wasn't there because it fits with a narrative you agree with. I do enjoy a good debate.
Dude you need to pick one, either accept government accepted history or pick non-governmental primary sources. You wanna play both sides because the narrative you choose to believe is not the truth.
touched a nerve, did I ?
You're not a respected historian, guy. lol
Your anecdotal understanding of the world based on 'people I talk to' is way too narrow and does not support a comprehensive view.
You like to argue, don't you?
I am literally making a historical site on US history from the year 1817 to 2021 And your logical fallacy of thinking someone needs to be a respected historian is laughable. How do you suppose someone learn recently history like NAZI Germany? You say its not what history teaches us, and so I tell you I am getting information from the people there. The primary source. And you have issue with it. You would rather hear it from someone who wasn't there because it fits with a narrative you agree with. I do enjoy a good debate.
A sign that someone has lost an argument is when the resort to name calling and attacks on a person's character.