Red October - Halyna Hutchins, Alex Baldwin
(i.4cdn.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (175)
sorted by:
...and that Q talked about Red October since 2017. And told us that the movie was required viewing for Anons.
A thought I had on the Baldwin - Red October:
The first mention of Red October was https://qposts.online/post/158
This was in November of 2017, almost 4 years ago. So, if this event was announced in the drops 4 years ago, it was planned well before that. It has to have been a staged event. It is a White Hat operation, by deducement. In no way could this be a Black Hat operation, if Q was posting publicly for 4 years about it. It made no sense to us, but the DS would know their plans had been foiled, and would have changed them. Additionally, nobody plans on a "hit" this desperate and transparent 4 + years in advance. It couldn't have been a spur of the moment action, as Q mentioned it in 2017. It was all fake.
So, Baldwin, is either a White Hat all along, or a Black Hat that was placed under our control - released from blackmail perhaps, as Q has mentioned about Supreme Court a few times. I mention this because of this drop: https://qposts.online/post/724 Specifically this line in the drop: "Note "The Hunt For" was dropped." This is dated Feb of 2018. So prior to this, it was "The Hunt for Red October" and after Feb/ 2018, they dropped "the hunt for".
To me, this indicates the hunt was over for their planned Red October event. Obviously, they had all the players in mind - No other participants would fit the Red October line as well. I think when "the hunt for" was dropped, they had secured Baldwin's participation. To secure his participation, Q would have to have removed the hook the DS had in him, and his participation in this event was his payment in return.
I had considered that Baldwin was a complete dupe, and that someone on the set put real bullets in - but that doesn't fit. It doesn't fit, because that person still could not know if Baldwin would point it right at the "victims". The victims and the shooter, as well as the set paramedics, and the evac chopper pilot all had to be in on this staged event.
So, what does this whole event accomplish? The "dead victim" appears to have been a White Hat Russian asset, and she is married to a lawyer who worked for the Clinton's. The Russian lady is now officially "dead", and is free from the whole mess, and I suspect has a new identity through witness protection all set up already. Her husband was either her mark, and it was not a real marriage to her, or the lawyer will testify under the subpoena to Durham, and then disappear with his wife. Sound crazy? I don't think so - see this drop:
https://qposts.online/post/4118
Specifically referring to this line: [it takes time to remove/install the right people [sleepers]]
What else does this crazy event accomplish? 1. It connects the Clinton's to their ever growing hit list of dead associates. 2. It wakes up more people to the connection of Hollywood to Politics to Deep State. 3. It will punish Baldwin for probable negligent homicide or a wrongful death charge of some type, which he accepted as reduced sentence for what he has really done. He may get a few years in prison, up to 5-10, but out earlier with good time.
That is my theory... and it is a wild one, but it answers all the questions (I think), and it is plausible (I think).
Every other way I try to make this work in my brain, it doesn't. It was not a real murder, White Hat or Black Hat.
We Are Watching A Show.
Man...
Well done.
Damn.... had not thought of this rabbit hole. This is the 4D chess that the white hats would be playing.
...I was being way to simple.
Dang blurpy, i love this.
Thanks!
Very impressive as usual Blurpy!! π
π Thank you - that is high praise from you, sir!
Heck, youβre top-tier Bro. Iβm not on that level. βπΌπ₯
That's a great theory but it would not explain the director getting hit too, unless he was also in on it.
Pretend is was a real shooting for a moment - in what reality would an accident match up so perfectly with Q statements made over the course of 4 years? None.
So, pretend it was a real shooting but not an accident, it was a murder - in what reality would a murderer (Baldwin) purposely shoot someone in circumstances so perfectly lining up with very public Q statements made for 4 years prior? None.
Conclusion: It was theater made to appear as an accident, and was meticulously planned (as only Q does it) to go off at the right time, with the right shooter, and the right "victim".
Really, I can't see anything else that makes sense. So, as this drama unfolds in the media, we will learn what Q really wants exposed, now that the thirst for information has been created with a sensationalized Hollywood incident.
The director being injured would certainly have to be in on it. The director would have the authority on the set to see everything was in place.
It was pure theater. It needed the director, lol.