3
downwithuppish 3 points ago +3 / -0

Regrets any confusion? So he goes around pulling random levers without any idea what they may be for and if people think he does it deliberately they're confused?

1
downwithuppish 1 point ago +1 / -0

He could've finally had it removed. Those pictures do look like a bunch of couples hanging out with their newly single friend.

Something to consider is if Big Mike is being prepared for POTUS then would it be better for her and Obama to split up so that she doesn't look like shes being controlled by him? Would the public find it too unbelievable that Obama was back in the WH and having no influence?

2
downwithuppish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Apparently this wasn't even the real picket. So I wouldn't read too much into that picture. Funny though

3
downwithuppish 3 points ago +3 / -0

What does that mean? I'll see if my barber does it next time I go.

8
downwithuppish 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yesterday I posted a thread on /pol/ regarding Russell Brand's refusal to be silenced, linking his latest video on censorship and the medias war on free speech. Today I find /pol/ has banned me for that thread because it wasn't about politics or current events.

2
downwithuppish 2 points ago +2 / -0

The controllable population is full of hysterical violent extremists, criminals, scoundrels, rioters and the mentally deranged.

2
downwithuppish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did Musk know they were going to call it X? Feels like he's stole their thunder so that it will no longer have the same scary impact they probably hoped it would.

4
downwithuppish 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's spoilt only child syndrome with them.

0
downwithuppish 0 points ago +1 / -1

These instant gratification experiments have been done a lot over the years. Kids find temptation really hard to resist when its presented to them.

6
downwithuppish 6 points ago +6 / -0

Someone in the replies says high profile people are often the target of stalkers, fanatics etc. But can anyone remember 42 stories of the Obama's having to deal with stalkers, trespassers or break ins at this residence? Wouldn't the msm have loved to have reported on just even 10 of these incidents to report on racist Republicans and deranged far right trying to attack their precious Obama?

Also I don't know how it works but if such past incidents were occurring, would the police even be called? Wouldn't incidents be dealt with in house? If so does that mean the 42 past incidents are things reported by and involving people which aren't the Obama's? If so....what the hell is going on at this place that guests and staff and whoever else has had to call in the police so many times?

Even if its 42 incidents involving missing people in the water, surely that would've been reported on by the media. So to me it looks like these incidents have been very intentionally covered up because it must be incriminating for the people doing the reporting. Any other explanation as to why the Obama team wouldn't want the msm reporting on incidents of trespassers, stalkers or accidents in the water?

4
downwithuppish 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its called money laundering. They funnel money by "donating" through thousands of fake citizens to the cause and to do that there needs to be a big public request and lots of hype

1
downwithuppish 1 point ago +1 / -0

They labelled every death Covid to scare and intimidate you into getting the vaccine. Use every sudden and unexplainable death of young vaxxed people to scare and intimidate them into never trying to control us again.

RIP

2
downwithuppish 2 points ago +2 / -0

You ALWAYS make time to talk to me

Yeah I bet he does

view more: Next ›