This result either shows an extremely flawed methodology or that the health care system is discriminating against non vaccinated people.
Maybe selecting people who took flu shots biased the sample and the correction for age etc further distorted the result.
They should take a single age group like 30-40 yrs where the vaccine uptake is fairly low and do all cause mortality. I suspect they wouldn't be able to publish that result though.
I suspect their process was
. run the numbers
. Discover the vaccine is killing more people than covid
. Diddle the methodology until this improbable result emerges
. Profit!
This result either shows an extremely flawed methodology or that the health care system is discriminating against non vaccinated people.
Maybe selecting people who took flu shots biased the sample and the correction for age etc further distorted the result.
They should take a single age group like 30-40 yrs where the vaccine uptake is fairly low and do all cause mortality. I suspect they wouldn't be able to publish that result though.
I suspect their process was . run the numbers . Discover the vaccine is killing more people than covid . Diddle the methodology until this improbable result emerges . Profit!
Exactly. Improbable result = most probably manipulated data
Kind of funny they didn't find a result a little more believable. Maybe it's a cry for help.