Ezra Cohen-Watnick retweeting a post from over a year ago about QAnon.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
I know a few annecdotal passages from the Talmud. Random leafing and it's as dry as a Law book.
No, I haven't studied the whole way through, but I doubt most of its critics have either. I've seen the web pages of "The Talmud Exposed!" by the Stormfront types. But I've also seen Talmud scholars rebut the attacks and mischaracterizations of "The Talmud Exposed" by placing the accusations in their proper contexts.
Example... Talmud Exposed types mention a molested girl because characterized as not counting as sex. Their claim is that it demonstrates the Talmud's authors believed sex with children is acceptable. The Talmud scholars say: "Not so. What's actually being discussed is whether the girl counts as a virgin or not. It was much more difficult for a girl who was not a virgin to be married off. Because the unfortunate girl was molested and not to blame for the tragedy, she still counts as a virgin, so she will not bear extra difficulty in getting married later on in life. The violation doesn't count against her for that."
That's one example I recall off the top of my head.
If you're referring to one group of laws for the elite (or for the Talmud's case, the Jews) versus those who aren't Jewish -- again, is that the idea of a two tier system of elites versus inferiors? Or is it citizens versus non citizens? If we're talking about ancient Israel, then wouldn't the citizens expect more rights than the foreigners? Countries have historically done this. Even today, modern Japan as benefits for the native Japanese than any outsider. Heck, you can argue that part of the problem we have here in the United States is that illegals have, in some ways, more rights than citizens do. And this is proving disastrous.
Third one is that the Talmud says unkind things about Jesus. Which might seem offensive to Christians. But I wouldn't be surprised to see rival religions say unkind thing about each other's central figures. Dante put Mohammad right there in Hell, didn't he?
I'm listening right now to James Lindsay's podcast on Hegelian dialectics, and how this method not only became a pseudo-religion, but was a diving board for Marxism, Communism, all the way to Wokism. Marx, Hitler, and modern leftists are followers of the Hegelian dialectic methodology, whether or not they're aware of it. And I wager most of the leftist Jews are as well. I once went to my childhood synagogue on Yom Kippur a few years back. There was a new Rabbi, a woman. On Yom Kippur she ranted about Walmart not paying their employees enough money. She found a golden calf to follow, a new religion, that she was preaching about on Yom Kippur out of all days. But it sure wasn't Judaism. She had more Marx in her than Moses.
The Talmud says Mother Mary had an affair with a Roman soldier & Jesus is a bastard. Jesus is currently burning in hell in a vat of feces?
Yeah dude, I think the Babylonian Talmud is evil & the religion of the Anti-Christ. The Torah? I have respect for that.. The Talmud? Sound like it was written by the Satanic Canaanites that practiced Ba’al worship.
In other words, you fall into the category I mentioned of: "How dare this other religion not be completely in line with my religion!"
I'm not really that sympathetic. I don't expect worshippers of Thor to be all that in line with Moses, I don't expect Christians to be fully respectful of Mohammad, and I'm a little surprised you expect Jews to be faithful to the Christian interpretation of Jesus. If Jews believed in Jesus, they'd be Christians, not Jews.
The Babylonian Canaanites / Phoenicians, the ancient enemies of the original Israelites, have conquered Judaism (thanks Rothchilds) and devolved it to serve their purposes.
The end goal is to drag as many people to hell as possible, even Gods original chosen people, who rejected his son. Though you may have earthly blessings passed down to you, it won’t be worth anything, come the day of judgement.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/106G1s9gkxsY/
The Eruv Rav who built the golden calf in Sinai -- echoes of them still reverberate today.
I think you're barking up the wrong tree to blame the Eruv Rav off the Talmud. Like was said before -- your average Rothschild, Soros, Zuckerburg never cracked the cover of the Talmud.
Hegel, Marx, Marcuso, Adorno -- these nutcases they study in colleges -- seems to be more in line with the objectives of the woke. And they have Jewish and gentile followers.
I'm still investigating that line, however.
This is an underrated comment not many people know this aspect where the people we are really talking about are the phonecians
Your modern version of Judaism is defined by its hatred for Christians. The Babylonian Talmud maybe “older” than Christianity but it’s only because the Talmud was finally put into writing, what, 400 years after the death of Jesus? Modern Jews reject the true Jewish Messiah (Jesus the Christ) & I believe your anticipated messiah is really our anti-Christ.
I respect the Torah, but the Babylonian Talmud is evil. I believe Modern day Judaism is really Babylonian black magik that King Solomon learned, while banging Canaanite women. Israelites have become the enemy of the Israelites of Moses’s time; the old Testiment is littered with examples of Israelites being seduced by the Ba’al worshippers; this era is no different.
Mind you, I don’t hate Jews, I love them enough to warn them of their false Babylonian religion that will lead to their destruction. The truth just sounds like hate.
....no, modern Judaism is not defined by hatred of Christianity. I know you will hate us for not accepting Jesus as messiah. We have our reasons.