The same reason that some women are short and some women are tall.
Genetic variation.
Also you’re using too many pictures of older women.
These older women are not getting the crap ton of female hormones circulating in their bodies in the same way that young women have.
“Oh look at that 80-year-old man, he has no muscle mass so he must be a woman”
That is the reason famous women get plastic surgery. It's because they can't hold back their tru nature from re-emerging.
Real normal women don't become masculine with age, they just become older women. But transwomens inherent masculinity has a resurgence which is why they get plastic surgery.
There is certainly genetic variance within both males and females, I grant you. But the basic form - the skeleton - follows rules. It's chromosomal. It's at a cellular level. I don't make the rules, god does. I'm just pointing out that practically all the famous females in movies, politics, royalty, big business, mmodelling, sports etc all conform to the male biology.
Who knows but I'm one of those women without hips so you're just going to have to accept it. All my life. Tall, slender. Athletic build. Small bust, no hips. And in my 59 yrs I've known many women who look like I do
I believe you. But still, you will have undeniable female markers. Like your ratios will still be feminine, and your belly button will still be below your waist for instance - because you are female. whereas a male counterparts belly button is level with or above his waist.
Yet you have decided these people are trans based on incomplete info. They may have undeniable female markers that you simply can't see in your photos/videos
You are losing people because of your insistence that you are right in your assessments despite not being privy to all the info necessary to know for sure.
Oh and that body builder? She's a body builder.working out like a mad woman and more than likely taking who knows what to look like that. Bad example imo
Also... nothing is exactly anything when it comes to the human body. So while it may be true that men are more likely to X and women are more likely to Y... nothing is set in stone. There are always ranges of normal. And then... not everyone falls within normal.
Not giving birth is a major part as to why some women don’t have wider hips. As a female who has yet to give birth I lack certain “shape” cause my pelvis hasn’t stretched while birthing.
I have a friend who has given birth, is pregnant with her second and STILL doesn’t have super feminine hips.
God creates us ALL differently. I wish I had super voluptuous hips, but God planned otherwise.
Yes, but your pelvis is still shaped differently to that of a man. And your belly button still occupies a different relative level., even if your hips aren't wide.
There are narrow female hips, and there are male pelvises. A female pelvis and a male pelvis are fundamentally and structurally different.
The pelvis is the surefire way to identify the sex of a skeleton. Nevertheless, there are clusters of skeletal clues, not just the pelvis.
Can you answer me something honestly? Can you take a look at this famous actress and answer me this: Are you looking at a biological male or a biological female, just based on the skull and face alone?
I agree, our skeletons are unique to our sex (male or female).
But sometimes it’s not as visible on the outside as much as others, that is what I’m pointing out.
can you tell me what one of those reasons might be?
The same reason that some women are short and some women are tall. Genetic variation.
Also you’re using too many pictures of older women. These older women are not getting the crap ton of female hormones circulating in their bodies in the same way that young women have.
“Oh look at that 80-year-old man, he has no muscle mass so he must be a woman”
-same logic
That is the reason famous women get plastic surgery. It's because they can't hold back their tru nature from re-emerging.
Real normal women don't become masculine with age, they just become older women. But transwomens inherent masculinity has a resurgence which is why they get plastic surgery.
Debbie Harry. How did her neck become so thick and powerful? She was a sprightly little thing but now has powerful jaw and neck? https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tZzqY0x52ro/maxresdefault.jpg
Deep set eyes, big skull https://img.apmcdn.org/e7d60f5245a8e94e07957d2aae7fc0db22c8cf63/uncropped/3f42a2-20190402-still-from-punk-documentary-on-epix-04.jpg
simply put, male.
Glenn Close, a male: https://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/glenn-close-oscars-2019-red-carpet-3.jpg
Look, I didn't make these things so mate - I'm just pointing them out to you for your own edification and so you might have more of a clue as to the exact nature of the entire deception of the world: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/03/article-0-1A20262E000005DC-72_634x708.jpg
https://www.evercoream.com/wp-content/uploads/daryl-hannah-plastic-surgery-beforea-and-after-photos.jpg
Don't just look. Perceive https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=kathleen%20turner&qs=n&form=QBIR&sp=-1&ghc=1&pq=kathleen%20turner&sc=8-15&cvid=9CB97D94D64B4193B7031C91792F63AB&first=1&tsc=ImageBasicHover
There is certainly genetic variance within both males and females, I grant you. But the basic form - the skeleton - follows rules. It's chromosomal. It's at a cellular level. I don't make the rules, god does. I'm just pointing out that practically all the famous females in movies, politics, royalty, big business, mmodelling, sports etc all conform to the male biology.
Here is Jacinda Aherne where it appears her cock has broken free of its holster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7YiFQFk6fc
Sports Illustrated: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fmbBTwZRsNNt/
You’re really wasting a lot of time aren’t you?
Is this the most important issue you could find?
If we uncover all the secret trans-men, will they put Trump back in office?
How much do you get paid for pumping out this crap 24 hours a day?
Finally, you sure do you have it formatted and laid out very well for someone who just spontaneously responded to my comment.
Haha that last part was the give away for me to. It seemed like someone with an agenda rather than someone sharing the truth.
Oh dear please don't hit me with that paid government whatever nonsense.
So what are you suggesting, that we just ignore the obvious massive deception?
Your comments on me having laid it all out neatly I'll take as a compliment.
Have a look at this one again.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/03/article-0-1A20262E000005DC-72_634x708.jpg
Do you agree that we are looking at a man?
Looks a bit like that trans in the shop that was shouting at the guy, if you know who I'm referring to ("It is MA'AM!!")
Who knows but I'm one of those women without hips so you're just going to have to accept it. All my life. Tall, slender. Athletic build. Small bust, no hips. And in my 59 yrs I've known many women who look like I do
I believe you. But still, you will have undeniable female markers. Like your ratios will still be feminine, and your belly button will still be below your waist for instance - because you are female. whereas a male counterparts belly button is level with or above his waist.
An athletic female is not equivalent to a male. Now, you need to look beyond the smoothness and the makeup and the superficial feminisation but here is a fitness model called Jamie Eason. Looking past the paintwork, the superficiality, are you looking at an athletic female body, or an athletic trans body? https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QKE2hscyw5o/TfrH-SpnhHI/AAAAAAAAAL0/Z8qR6PEa_ys/s1600/jamie-eason-bikini-58.jpg
Yet you have decided these people are trans based on incomplete info. They may have undeniable female markers that you simply can't see in your photos/videos
You are losing people because of your insistence that you are right in your assessments despite not being privy to all the info necessary to know for sure.
Oh and that body builder? She's a body builder.working out like a mad woman and more than likely taking who knows what to look like that. Bad example imo
Also... nothing is exactly anything when it comes to the human body. So while it may be true that men are more likely to X and women are more likely to Y... nothing is set in stone. There are always ranges of normal. And then... not everyone falls within normal.
You can take all the drugs you like to be a bodybuilder but you cannot exercise or medicate your way into a different skeletal structure.
Not giving birth is a major part as to why some women don’t have wider hips. As a female who has yet to give birth I lack certain “shape” cause my pelvis hasn’t stretched while birthing. I have a friend who has given birth, is pregnant with her second and STILL doesn’t have super feminine hips. God creates us ALL differently. I wish I had super voluptuous hips, but God planned otherwise.
Yes, but your pelvis is still shaped differently to that of a man. And your belly button still occupies a different relative level., even if your hips aren't wide.
There are narrow female hips, and there are male pelvises. A female pelvis and a male pelvis are fundamentally and structurally different.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/7b/2b/5e/7b2b5ea41f7d9cfa4841f6a89f201c5e--human-anatomy-vs.jpg
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3034/2283718939_0939370dc0_z.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1Qm7d4cCt8
The pelvis is the surefire way to identify the sex of a skeleton. Nevertheless, there are clusters of skeletal clues, not just the pelvis.
Can you answer me something honestly? Can you take a look at this famous actress and answer me this: Are you looking at a biological male or a biological female, just based on the skull and face alone?
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/03/article-0-1A20262E000005DC-72_634x708.jpg
I agree, our skeletons are unique to our sex (male or female). But sometimes it’s not as visible on the outside as much as others, that is what I’m pointing out.
that's true, however what was your answer to my last question re Glenn Close.
Is that photo one of a male or female?