But your whole Theory falls apart anyway with Christ’s own words about his return
Mark 13:32 But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
Luke 12:40 You also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.
Unless you are saying that Jesus had a change of heart and decided to just telegraph his return way ahead of time?
How can you have the gall to say that such a weak theory has a 99% probability of being true.
You’ve clearly just been watching and inspired by Bill Brockbaders interview on Looking Glass instead of reading your Bible, in which case it may interest you to know that Bill himself says that all religions (including Christianity) are hokum and that there is really the involvement of aliens from the galactic federation.
Because unlike you I have faith. Unlike you I did my research. And unlike you, carefully read the last paragraph of info. And understand Christ’s forever sacrifice for us.
I never once claimed that. Do not put words into my mouth or try to state such that I typed. As you would be clearly lying. Anyone can read my theory. Let me repeat my last paragraph, about who Q or on the other side of Q may be, here so you can pull your head out and maybe, maybe wrap that tarnished mind around my proposed concept. And whom is to say that God himself did or didn’t provided me the will, and maybe the idea to share. I’m just providing what came into my head from what I researched.
“Why Christ? He is the only one that would do this without worrying about ANY repercussions, even time repercussions. He would be the only one that could possibly know it would be successful. And he would easily sacrifice himself at ANY cost, even his human life easily, to make sure we are safe and forgiven. That was his lasting promise that Christ would risk all, to keep. To save humanity, to save God’s children, his children.”
Now, step outside of the box focusing on the Bible alone, and think of Christ’s overall promise of forgiveness over humanity. Now think of Q’s messages across the passed near 5 years. Now think about Future Proves Past. Now research and think about how Quantum Echo Theory works on Quantum Bundling. If you can wrap your mind around this, you might be able to get the concept.
Sorry Brent, but I just don’t buy you as a prophet.
A false prophet, maybe, as the Bible warns about.
The Bible is the whole and complete and incorruptible word of God. It is not amenable to the revision and improvement of the self-appointed prophet Brent75.
Jesus said that no one - not even himself - would know of his coming at the end of the age. ONLY the Father knows.
But now you are saying that you know because you believe in Q and that Jesus is communicating directly with the US Military of all things and requires fancy tech and rhetorical questions to do so.
Umm, I acknowledge your theory but I am afraid I find it unpersuasive. I’ll stick to the Bible.
I think however that there would be value in you creating a separate post with your ideas, fleshing them out in a bit more depth, so that they can garner a wider audience and exchange of ideas rather than being lost in the crevices of an already huge thread.
Nobody asked.
But your whole Theory falls apart anyway with Christ’s own words about his return
Mark 13:32 But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
Luke 12:40 You also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.
Unless you are saying that Jesus had a change of heart and decided to just telegraph his return way ahead of time?
How can you have the gall to say that such a weak theory has a 99% probability of being true.
You’ve clearly just been watching and inspired by Bill Brockbaders interview on Looking Glass instead of reading your Bible, in which case it may interest you to know that Bill himself says that all religions (including Christianity) are hokum and that there is really the involvement of aliens from the galactic federation.
Because unlike you I have faith. Unlike you I did my research. And unlike you, carefully read the last paragraph of info. And understand Christ’s forever sacrifice for us.
So you are a prophet are you and have the authority to overwrite scripture? To overwrite the very words from the very mouth of Jesus?
I never once claimed that. Do not put words into my mouth or try to state such that I typed. As you would be clearly lying. Anyone can read my theory. Let me repeat my last paragraph, about who Q or on the other side of Q may be, here so you can pull your head out and maybe, maybe wrap that tarnished mind around my proposed concept. And whom is to say that God himself did or didn’t provided me the will, and maybe the idea to share. I’m just providing what came into my head from what I researched.
“Why Christ? He is the only one that would do this without worrying about ANY repercussions, even time repercussions. He would be the only one that could possibly know it would be successful. And he would easily sacrifice himself at ANY cost, even his human life easily, to make sure we are safe and forgiven. That was his lasting promise that Christ would risk all, to keep. To save humanity, to save God’s children, his children.”
Now, step outside of the box focusing on the Bible alone, and think of Christ’s overall promise of forgiveness over humanity. Now think of Q’s messages across the passed near 5 years. Now think about Future Proves Past. Now research and think about how Quantum Echo Theory works on Quantum Bundling. If you can wrap your mind around this, you might be able to get the concept.
Sorry Brent, but I just don’t buy you as a prophet.
A false prophet, maybe, as the Bible warns about.
The Bible is the whole and complete and incorruptible word of God. It is not amenable to the revision and improvement of the self-appointed prophet Brent75.
Jesus said that no one - not even himself - would know of his coming at the end of the age. ONLY the Father knows.
But now you are saying that you know because you believe in Q and that Jesus is communicating directly with the US Military of all things and requires fancy tech and rhetorical questions to do so.
Umm, I acknowledge your theory but I am afraid I find it unpersuasive. I’ll stick to the Bible.
I think however that there would be value in you creating a separate post with your ideas, fleshing them out in a bit more depth, so that they can garner a wider audience and exchange of ideas rather than being lost in the crevices of an already huge thread.