Because white people in general are too rebellious and make poor slaves. Asians seem to be the most compliant and the ultimate goal, they're already throwing black voters under the bus (Biden flat out told Al Sharpton they'd be replaced with Hispanics) and they've already targeted Indians and many Africans with Gate's "vaccines". Eventually they'll wipe out the Latinos as well once they're no longer useful enough.
Well first of all, you're wrong about the shrinking part. By saying that you're buying into the cabals division tactics. There's no such thing as a "hispanic/latino". They're all white. I don't feel like going into the whole freaking story for the upteenth time on this board, but the short version is, hispanics/latinos were considered white by most nations up until the 60s, when they started fracturing racial demographics to creative racial divisions for political gain. Why you may ask? Because they're freaking white!
People from spain and portugual, are white by pretty much anyones standards, and guess what? Every "hispanic/latino" majority nation was colonized by spain and portugal and their populations are descended from those Spanish/Portuguese colonists the same way most people in the USA are descended from the UK, Germany, etc.
There are only 3 races, White, Black, and Asian. Every "race" the cabal has made up is really just cultural demographic. Asians are easy, pretty much every asian nation sans India are asian. Blacks, likewise, are rather obvious, being mostly of African or Australian (Aboriginals) descent. Whites have been fractured the most (big surprise there). There's the Angolsaxon/German/Nordic whites, then there's the hispanic/latino whites, then there's the arabs/middle easterners, and of course the Eastern European Slavs.
That being said there ARE two notable exceptions to this in the American Indians and Asian Indians. Both are kind of odd in that they don't fit any genetic racial profile. They're basically remnants of the first people that came out of the Fertile zones of the Mediterranean. That's why they tend to have characteristics that seemingly belong to other races.
Genetic science and history lesson aside, this type of thinking is stupid and divisive. There is no such thing as an "ethnostate" in the modern world outside. even Japan and South Korea, the two most genetically homogenous nations on the planet, have a large population of whites (including latinos/hispanics since they're really white) due to all of the American military bases in those areas. Which inevitable leads to Americans developing relationships with the locals.
This isn't about race. It's not white V everyone else. It's EVERYONE V the cabal, regardless of race.
They're not afraid everyone else. They know they can brainwash the rest. Once they reduce 10% to 1% everyone else will be proper slaves and they won't oppose any tyranny they would like to implement.
This is an interesting "academic" similar question:
How being a white person became a crime
DOUGLAS MURRAY Sep 14, 2019 8:20 PM ET
Oxford University’s Research Encyclopedia describes whiteness studies as: “A growing field of scholarship whose aim is to reveal the invisible structures that produce white supremacy and privilege.”
Whereas black studies celebrates black writers and black history, and gay studies brings out gay figures from history and pushes them to the fore, “whiteness studies” is “committed to disrupting racism by problematizing whiteness,” according to Syracuse University professor Barbara Applebaum, who wrote Oxford’s definition. This is to be done “as a corrective.”
Defining an entire group of people, their attitudes, pitfalls and moral associations, based solely on their racial characteristics is itself a fairly good demonstration of racism. For “whiteness” to be “problematized” white people must be shown to be a problem. And not only on some academic, abstract level but in the practical day-to-day business of judging other people. As so often this progression of an idea from academia into the rest of society has found its most notable demonstrations in the world of celebrity.
Because only whites have the capability to be racist and to be called racist.🤷♀️🤦♀️
Because white people in general are too rebellious and make poor slaves. Asians seem to be the most compliant and the ultimate goal, they're already throwing black voters under the bus (Biden flat out told Al Sharpton they'd be replaced with Hispanics) and they've already targeted Indians and many Africans with Gate's "vaccines". Eventually they'll wipe out the Latinos as well once they're no longer useful enough.
Societal pressure is tough....I've actually said to others that I am Black Irish...which I am...boy the stares...
Me, too. People don't even know about it. Nor do they know about our struggles.
Boy the Irish and Latino combos are quite fiery at times...eh? 😎
Well first of all, you're wrong about the shrinking part. By saying that you're buying into the cabals division tactics. There's no such thing as a "hispanic/latino". They're all white. I don't feel like going into the whole freaking story for the upteenth time on this board, but the short version is, hispanics/latinos were considered white by most nations up until the 60s, when they started fracturing racial demographics to creative racial divisions for political gain. Why you may ask? Because they're freaking white!
People from spain and portugual, are white by pretty much anyones standards, and guess what? Every "hispanic/latino" majority nation was colonized by spain and portugal and their populations are descended from those Spanish/Portuguese colonists the same way most people in the USA are descended from the UK, Germany, etc.
There are only 3 races, White, Black, and Asian. Every "race" the cabal has made up is really just cultural demographic. Asians are easy, pretty much every asian nation sans India are asian. Blacks, likewise, are rather obvious, being mostly of African or Australian (Aboriginals) descent. Whites have been fractured the most (big surprise there). There's the Angolsaxon/German/Nordic whites, then there's the hispanic/latino whites, then there's the arabs/middle easterners, and of course the Eastern European Slavs.
That being said there ARE two notable exceptions to this in the American Indians and Asian Indians. Both are kind of odd in that they don't fit any genetic racial profile. They're basically remnants of the first people that came out of the Fertile zones of the Mediterranean. That's why they tend to have characteristics that seemingly belong to other races.
Genetic science and history lesson aside, this type of thinking is stupid and divisive. There is no such thing as an "ethnostate" in the modern world outside. even Japan and South Korea, the two most genetically homogenous nations on the planet, have a large population of whites (including latinos/hispanics since they're really white) due to all of the American military bases in those areas. Which inevitable leads to Americans developing relationships with the locals.
This isn't about race. It's not white V everyone else. It's EVERYONE V the cabal, regardless of race.
They're not afraid everyone else. They know they can brainwash the rest. Once they reduce 10% to 1% everyone else will be proper slaves and they won't oppose any tyranny they would like to implement.
This is an interesting "academic" similar question:
How being a white person became a crime DOUGLAS MURRAY Sep 14, 2019 8:20 PM ET Oxford University’s Research Encyclopedia describes whiteness studies as: “A growing field of scholarship whose aim is to reveal the invisible structures that produce white supremacy and privilege.”
Whereas black studies celebrates black writers and black history, and gay studies brings out gay figures from history and pushes them to the fore, “whiteness studies” is “committed to disrupting racism by problematizing whiteness,” according to Syracuse University professor Barbara Applebaum, who wrote Oxford’s definition. This is to be done “as a corrective.”
Defining an entire group of people, their attitudes, pitfalls and moral associations, based solely on their racial characteristics is itself a fairly good demonstration of racism. For “whiteness” to be “problematized” white people must be shown to be a problem. And not only on some academic, abstract level but in the practical day-to-day business of judging other people. As so often this progression of an idea from academia into the rest of society has found its most notable demonstrations in the world of celebrity.
https://hotair.com/headlines/2019/09/14/white-person-became-crime-n336534
Why, our white privilege, of course! Where on Earth HAVE you been? You don't know we have to check our privilege???????