I live this board for news, info, and memes but know little about Q...can someone explain why when they gave an exact date and time for arrest and it didnt happen why thats not seen as a source that is inaccurate? My second question is why do people believe something that gives and exact date and time believed to actually or at least possibly mean that date but in a future year?
That premise only fails if you subscribe to the Q-As-County-Fair-Fortune-Teller narrative as peddled in the MSM. The important distinction to make is that Q was responding to an Anon post which gave a date/time of HRC arrest, not calling the shot.
Personally, I believe that first post was desig ned/intended to get eyeballs on. Given that we're two days away from 4 years later, I'd call that a resounding success.
If, indeed, the purpose of what we know to be the first Q drop (unsigned) turns out to be something other than to telegraph the arrest of HRC, then it's mine and others' belief that it needed to be a statement so grandiose and spectacular, that it's content & author could not be ignored.
A response to an anon stating a specific time/date that the candidate for one of our two major political parties being arrested less than 1 year after a Presidential election would absolutely make the cut for such an irresistible topic.
There is a history of anons posting on /pol/, FBIAnon, MegAnon, et. al. who came to the table with good intel, so the stage was set that the content would be worth following.
You might want to start reading the Q drops from the beginning. Start with #1. It will give you a lot of insight into many of the comments on this board. Here's a place to start reading. The small arrow at top can reorder the posts so #1 is shown first. There are several other sites that maintain the Q drops should this one go down. This site gives a lot of options, including seeing Trump twitter posts interspersed with the Q drops. Over time we had to learn to "read into" the drops to discover the "hidden information". Some messages were easy to see with an obvious direct link to news, but most were obscure due to "plausable deniability" and only the high functioning autists could provide rational guesses as to potential multiple meanings. Some have postulated that the posts are written in REVERSE order, and the earliest posts will be what happens last.
If you see references to a Q Clock, it's a spiral with the dates of Q posts, that has in the past had good line ups with current news, once you learn how to read it. There used to be an app that helped show what was "on the clock" for that day, but not sure if it's still maintained.
I live this board for news, info, and memes but know little about Q...can someone explain why when they gave an exact date and time for arrest and it didnt happen why thats not seen as a source that is inaccurate? My second question is why do people believe something that gives and exact date and time believed to actually or at least possibly mean that date but in a future year?
That premise only fails if you subscribe to the Q-As-County-Fair-Fortune-Teller narrative as peddled in the MSM. The important distinction to make is that Q was responding to an Anon post which gave a date/time of HRC arrest, not calling the shot.
Personally, I believe that first post was desig ned/intended to get eyeballs on. Given that we're two days away from 4 years later, I'd call that a resounding success.
Please elaborate how its a success if hillary still isnt arrested
She probably already dead. She has about 8 doubles.
If, indeed, the purpose of what we know to be the first Q drop (unsigned) turns out to be something other than to telegraph the arrest of HRC, then it's mine and others' belief that it needed to be a statement so grandiose and spectacular, that it's content & author could not be ignored.
A response to an anon stating a specific time/date that the candidate for one of our two major political parties being arrested less than 1 year after a Presidential election would absolutely make the cut for such an irresistible topic.
There is a history of anons posting on /pol/, FBIAnon, MegAnon, et. al. who came to the table with good intel, so the stage was set that the content would be worth following.
You might want to start reading the Q drops from the beginning. Start with #1. It will give you a lot of insight into many of the comments on this board. Here's a place to start reading. The small arrow at top can reorder the posts so #1 is shown first. There are several other sites that maintain the Q drops should this one go down. This site gives a lot of options, including seeing Trump twitter posts interspersed with the Q drops. Over time we had to learn to "read into" the drops to discover the "hidden information". Some messages were easy to see with an obvious direct link to news, but most were obscure due to "plausable deniability" and only the high functioning autists could provide rational guesses as to potential multiple meanings. Some have postulated that the posts are written in REVERSE order, and the earliest posts will be what happens last.
If you see references to a Q Clock, it's a spiral with the dates of Q posts, that has in the past had good line ups with current news, once you learn how to read it. There used to be an app that helped show what was "on the clock" for that day, but not sure if it's still maintained.