We should believe the one source stating fakery from the Washington Times over the FIVE sources you provided stating it's truth becuase the people at the Washington Times are special. We don't need to look up any more sources when they say something.
Gotta like the people who poopoo a post you make with some slogan without stating any sources at all. We're just supposed to accept that their slogan overrides your statement on their superior nature or something.
I don't think it's lazy to ask for sauce. If someone is posting then you might assume they've already done some research and nothing wrong with asking for it. I have the same question. We've heard about this defector previously and not sure there has been any reliable confirmation as to the validity of the claim.
Do we know this as a fact?
I have heard of this. But it is a 100% fact?
No dooming here. Just curious.
We should believe the one source stating fakery from the Washington Times over the FIVE sources you provided stating it's truth becuase the people at the Washington Times are special. We don't need to look up any more sources when they say something.
Gotta like the people who poopoo a post you make with some slogan without stating any sources at all. We're just supposed to accept that their slogan overrides your statement on their superior nature or something.
I don't think it's lazy to ask for sauce. If someone is posting then you might assume they've already done some research and nothing wrong with asking for it. I have the same question. We've heard about this defector previously and not sure there has been any reliable confirmation as to the validity of the claim.
Except that the five sources all go back to one or two sources. Looks like redstate and Adam Housley are the two sources listed.
Of course. The definitive sauce: Sources say
Keep in mind if the Washington times wants you to think it's fake you know it's real.
Great post u/rooftoptendie! 👏