I'm not saying there is or isn't living organisms in the vaccines. What I am saying is that this is a single sample by two doctors. This tells us nothing. It's just like the sampling of ballots. Pick the sample that looks good.
Let's have this same study done globally with doctors that are for and against the vaccine. That would be a better study.
What I don't understand is why we could perfectly see the red blood cells in the "healthy" slide but the "unhealthy" slide was not at the same magnification and you couldn't make out the shape of the blood cells. Something smells fishy here.
I'm not saying there is or isn't living organisms in the vaccines. What I am saying is that this is a single sample by two doctors. This tells us nothing. It's just like the sampling of ballots. Pick the sample that looks good.
Let's have this same study done globally with doctors that are for and against the vaccine. That would be a better study.
Dr Fleming did suggest and encouraged other scientists to replicate his study. That will certainly tell us something.
Exactly. With maybe 1000 different batches. And do more than a visual.
I agree
Agreed! He is criticizing their results, yet he did a very low powered study.
In order to peer review Dr. Madej's results, he would have attempted to replicate her method.
And someone needs to look at large numbers of vials of every brand.
What I don't understand is why we could perfectly see the red blood cells in the "healthy" slide but the "unhealthy" slide was not at the same magnification and you couldn't make out the shape of the blood cells. Something smells fishy here.
100% agree!